Sabtu, 30 Agustus 2014

adult history Re-Shaping Public Education: The I's that See the We - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Budget, Artikel Community College, Artikel Gov Brown, Artikel How Things Work, Artikel K-12 Adult Ed, Artikel K12 and CC Coordination, Artikel Perspective, Artikel Possibilities, Artikel Privatization, Artikel Public Education, Artikel Regional Consortia, Artikel Strategy, Artikel Teachers, Artikel Think About It, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Re-Shaping Public Education: The I's that See the We - japraklupo
link : adult history Re-Shaping Public Education: The I's that See the We - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

Clearly, this is a perspective piece.

Thank you to Alliance for California Adult Schools for finding the document it's based on and sharing it on the A4CAS Facebook page.

I am sharing and analyzing the following 2011 Community College Academic Senate Resolution because I think it reveals a lot about how we've gotten to where we are now...

Hit the "read more" link to see and understand more...


to this place where we have a new system for delivering Adult Education - the Regional Consortia system which involves both K12 District Adult Schools and Community Colleges - but haven't decided how to fund that system....  and with no security for the K12 Adult Schools...  even though they have done of the lion's share of delivering Adult Education since 1868.

It is important that we understand why K12 Adult Schools need their own secure dedicated funding within the new Regional Consortia system.

It is important not only for the basic reason that if you have two groups mandated to do something - in this case, deliver Adult Education - but you fund only one of them or put only one of them in charge of the money, you can pretty much guarantee trouble...

but also because human beings are not only wonderful, insightful, generous, etc.

they are also greedy, manipulative, intentionally unfair, etc.

and even just... well meaning but with blind spots. 

Me, too.  That's just how we are.

That's why, when you are creating a structure for human beings - like a government - you have to build in checks and balances.  You have to factor in the best people can do and the worst.  You try to create something that brings out the best, puts a check on the worst, and if the worst does happen, has a way to deal with it.

You definitely don't do things like ask two groups to do something but only give one of them the funds to do it and/or put only one of them in charge.

The following resolution is old.  It's from 2011.  But I think it's very important that we look at it because it reveals something about how we've gotten here... and... I think it falls in the category of "humans not being their best selves."  It's an example of how humans can manipulate information, presenting it in a way that benefits them but not the larger community.

That's my intro and now here we go:

Before the December 2012 Legislative Analyst Report, "Restructuring California's Adult Education System," and a few months after the June 2011 Little Hoover Report on Adult Education, and some years after Wall Street decisions caused international economic chaos in 2008 and Schwartzenegger decided to respond to said chaos by "flexing" Adult School money and making it available to K12 Districts so they could survive....

While we were in the midst of dealing with chaos in our public education system... cuts to all branches and cost increases for colleges and universities... 

K12 Adult Schools K12 Districts were presented as hostile to Adult Education in a resolution by the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges....  

and it was recommended - by the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - that Adult Ed be put in the Community College system.    (The resolution is in full below and I will go through it, point by point.)

Wow - Community Colleges saying that K12 Districts are basically bad places for Adult Ed to be and all Adult Ed should be put inside the Community College system.  Wow.  Why?

Before we get into that, you might want to know: What's the Academic Senate for California Community College?

The Community College Academic Senate is basically the voice of Community College faculty for statewide policy.  It's sort of like a really big student council but teachers and for the whole state.  And just for Community Colleges. 

(By the way, K12 Adult School teachers don't have one of these.  Maybe it would have been helpful if we had. Something to think about.)

And then, you might want to know:  What's a resolution?

It's a recommendation.  That's basically it.  A suggestion.  It's not a law.  It's not a bill that could become a law.  It's a formal suggestion that people have thought about and talked about and voted on as their official position on something.

Okay, now we can get into it.  Here's the 2011 resolution with my comments in italics:

Assign Responsibility for Adult Education to California Community Colleges

Fall 2011
Resolution Number: 06.03
Contact: Esther Matthew
Assigned to : President
Topic:  State and Legislative Issues
Status: Assigned
 
Whereas, The responsibility for adult education in California is inconsistently applied throughout the state, in some cases being assumed by the K-12 system and in others by community colleges;

(Adult Education has been delivered by K12 Adult School since 1868.  By Community Colleges, for much less.  "We've been here before," a powerpoint history of Adult Education in California, is a good thing to review at this point.)

Whereas, The K-12 system has shifted millions of dollars in adult education funds to support other K-12 categorical programs that had experienced deep funding cuts, leading to a transfer of more than $400 million out of adult education programs;

(I'm not sure what they're talking about here.  Most of the categoricals were flexed.  A few were not.  I will do my homework and find out which weren't.  The Adult Ed money that was flexed and used by districts did not so much go to "support other categoricals" as simply go to keep K12 Districts going.  All public education was under great stress.  Adult Ed money might have gone to pay a teacher's salary or to buy books or to clean the cafeteria or to pay for school buses.  Basically, it just kept public K12 schools going.  A sad thing, yes.  Sad that we that the whole financial collapse happened in the first place.  Sad that public education has been struggling since Prop 13 and was finally brought to its knees by the financial collapse.  But a bad thing that K12 schools survived?  No.  And if Adult Ed money had gone to prop up Community Colleges, I doubt the Academic Senate would have thought this was bad.  But it didn't help Community Colleges.  It helped K12 Schools.)

Whereas, The California Community Colleges Task Force on Student Success (established in response to Senate Bill 1143, Liu, 2010) draft recommendations (as of September 30, 2011) indicate that the State of California should develop a comprehensive strategy for addressing basic skills instruction, including providing for adult education; and

(Many people who work in Community Colleges are not happy with all the Task Force recommendations as you will see in this video:



I support the people in this video, by the way.  I support their cause.  I'm using the video to demonstrate a point:  When it comes to these official recommendation things, people often pull out the parts they like and present them in isolation. 

When it works to their advantage, great, mention it.  When it doesn't, protest the part you don't like separately.   But don't present things in context.  Don't look at and remind people of the whole. 

Again, I have nothing against the folks in this video.  And they aren't the Academic Senate.  I'm just pointing out that the Task Force Recommendations are complicated and folks in Community Colleges - teachers, admin, students - feel all kinds of ways about the various recommendations. 

I understand.  Sometimes I like parts of something and don't like other parts.  But if so, I need to be honest and state that somewhere.  Otherwise, it's more or less "manipulating data" or in this case, recommendations.

The Task Force Recommendations are their own big thing.  They have had a huge impact.  They are another big piece of the puzzle of Public Education changes.  I am not going to try cover that piece here.)

Whereas, California community colleges are best suited to provide adult education throughout the state but cannot properly fulfill this function due to budgetary constraints;

Okay, basically my response to this is "Says who?"    I mean, really, who says that Community Colleges are best suited for delivering Adult Education?  

Okay, let's think about that for a minute.  What has been everyone's feeling on who thinks Adult Ed should be delivered by Community Colleges - they do it best....

Some community colleges thought so - not all of them.

The Governor thought so.  That's a biggie. He's not "the people" but he's their leader and he's a strong leader who is not afraid of using his veto power plus he writes the budget.

The LAO - Legislative Analyst Office - didn't think so. They recommended some changes - many of which I don't personally like. But they thought the two programs should continue on and they thought K12 Adult Schools should regain categorical status once the smoke of flex cleared.

A lot of students and teachers and admin at K12 Adult Schools didn't think so.

Some teachers and admin at K12 Adult Schools thought so because they didn't like their K12 Districts and how those districts were dealing with the economic downturn.  I'm just going to come right out and say that some people - not all! - in LA thought Adult Ed would be better off in Community Colleges... and now that all this stuff is coming out about the ipad wheelings and dealings... maybe what the real trouble was and always is:  K12 Districts which do things badly or have some corruption going on... create problems.  Same thing is true of Community Colleges.  Or Universities.  Or anything!  We are back to the truth that human beings are capable of both help and harm.  Which is why it is good to have structures that account for both and encourage the former and discourage the latter. Because let's face it:  crap happens.  And as a third generation public school teacher and as a human being, I will tell you:  Crap happens in schools.  And in business.  And in hospitals.  And in homes.  I mean, again... we are human beings!  We're not nice all the time!

But mostly... and I think I can be pretty safe in saying this because I have been working on all this for over 5 years now and over the course of that time, have talked to people around the state...  mostly the K12 Adult School students and teachers and admin and surrounding communities liked their K12 Adult Schools.  They just wanted them to have secure funding again.  The problem was not the schools.  The problem was the funding.  And the funding connects back to that huge economic mess and one could even argue, goes all the way back to Prop 13.  And that is why I don't like losing our broad mission.  Because I think it is important to see ourselves as a community.  And not think college and career readiness and money and business is the answer to every human problem.  Business actually creates some problems.  I mean, let's remember:  Wall Street is a business!  The people working there who made the decisions they made were very college and career ready!  Life is not just about making money!  Life is about the choices you make with the resources you have - including money, energy, people, intelligence, heart, etc.  We are a river that needs two banks - and only one of them has dollars in it.  Social emotional intelligence and health matters.  Strong, resilient communities matter.  They are part of what creates an economy that benefits the group and not just a very small portion of it.   Did I digress?  Yes and no.  This whole thing - this whole adventure - is about reshaping Adult Education, which is a structure.  And the only way you can build a good structure is to truly know what you are creating it for - to see the natural shape of something and then create a form which supports it in the healthiest and most beautiful way possible.  So really... all this reshaping Adult Education... and all public education... is about how we see ourselves. 

That's the truth and it's not said out loud real often.  But it's the truth.  We are arguing about who and what we are... a vision shaped by our own perceptions...  perceptions colored by our capacity and character...  Are we willing and able to see things we don't like?  Are we willing and able to see things that are painful to realize or address?  Are we willing and able to see solutions which might not be of great benefit to us personally or to ourselves, alone?  Are we willing and able to share what we see with others?  Publically? Are we willing to take the heat for speaking up when others fear to?   Are we willing to speak up for something which might be reviled?  Are we willing to advocate for people the larger culture ignores or denies or rejects?  Are we willing to put forth solutions which might be rejected?   All these questions - and of course, their answers - shape we're going as a people. 

Our personal decisions to see or not see... speak or not speak... shape our collective future.


Back to what Brown sees as a solution...  Brown didn't support Prop 13 and he didn't flex categoricals.  Previous administrations did both. He was left holding the hot potato.

And when given a hot potato, what do most people want to do with it?  Pass it on! 

It's hard to sit with a problem you did not create and try to tease out what caused the problem and then slowly and wisely think through what solutions might solve it.

I think "give Adult Ed to the Community Colleges" is a hot potato solution.  It sounds good.  But it doesn't really solve the problem.  It doesn't even just pass it on.  It actually makes things worse.  But...  again... human beings!  We don't always think things through.  (Me, too!)


Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges recommend that the Board of Governors urge the Legislature to assign responsibility for adult education to the California community colleges but only if sufficient funding to address this mission is provided.

MSC
Appendix A: California Community Colleges Task Force on Student Success


Lessons and questions:

1.  What weight did this have with people?  With Legislators?  With the Governor?  With various agencies and commissions and so forth?  It obviously did not have a lot of weight with the LAO because the LAO recommended the opposite.  The LAO also pushed for narrowing the mission... something mirrored in the Task Force recommendations for the Community College system also... the whole push for College and Career Readiness versus "community"... which mostly, CC folks are not happy about...  My takeaway:  The resolution probably had some weight.  They thought about things.  They came to a decision about what they wanted. They spoke up.  Speaking up is good.  But other people also thought about things and many said, "No.  We don't agree with you."

2.  Why the heck did they think they could say that Community Colleges are "best suited"?  Can you just say that something is best suited without real proof?  What did they base on that on?  It always boggles my mind how people can be so bold.  On the other hand, being bold has its benefits. In any case, I disagree with them.  As do many people.  Some of whom I disagree with on many other points!  I always love what CDE Superintendent Tom Torlakson said about the whole put Adult Ed inside Community Colleges thing:  "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"   Thank you, Tom.

3.  Ideas are the beginning of everything.  Never think that your idea doesn't matter.  It matters.  A lot.  Really, we're all just operating on a lot of collective ideas - yes, that and gravity, and water and oxygen and rocks and plants and animals, I know.  There are "real" things.  But if we were all operating on just "real" things, then human culture would be the same across time and space.  And it isn't.  Because our ideas... what  we decide matters.. our perceptions... change.   A good idea... a timely idea...  well expressed... can change everything.   It just takes time - and energy.  But that's where everything begins.

4.  That's why I think it's so important to really think about these things.  Education is the hand that rocks the cultural cradle.  We're reshaping public education.  Okay.  But how?  Who is that baby in the cradle?  What sort of people do we want them to grow up to be?  Education - how much, how little, for whom, to what purpose - shapes our future.

What do we want?

When we look into the future, what do we see?

Who's doing the looking and what shapes how they see things?

What's the past of the people shaping the future?

A lot of "I's" shape a we.

Past, present, and future - who are they?  And what do they see?


At what point do we wake up and smell the coffee?





 

Clearly, this is a perspective piece.

Thank you to Alliance for California Adult Schools for finding the document it's based on and sharing it on the A4CAS Facebook page.

I am sharing and analyzing the following 2011 Community College Academic Senate Resolution because I think it reveals a lot about how we've gotten to where we are now...

Hit the "read more" link to see and understand more...


to this place where we have a new system for delivering Adult Education - the Regional Consortia system which involves both K12 District Adult Schools and Community Colleges - but haven't decided how to fund that system....  and with no security for the K12 Adult Schools...  even though they have done of the lion's share of delivering Adult Education since 1868.

It is important that we understand why K12 Adult Schools need their own secure dedicated funding within the new Regional Consortia system.

It is important not only for the basic reason that if you have two groups mandated to do something - in this case, deliver Adult Education - but you fund only one of them or put only one of them in charge of the money, you can pretty much guarantee trouble...

but also because human beings are not only wonderful, insightful, generous, etc.

they are also greedy, manipulative, intentionally unfair, etc.

and even just... well meaning but with blind spots. 

Me, too.  That's just how we are.

That's why, when you are creating a structure for human beings - like a government - you have to build in checks and balances.  You have to factor in the best people can do and the worst.  You try to create something that brings out the best, puts a check on the worst, and if the worst does happen, has a way to deal with it.

You definitely don't do things like ask two groups to do something but only give one of them the funds to do it and/or put only one of them in charge.

The following resolution is old.  It's from 2011.  But I think it's very important that we look at it because it reveals something about how we've gotten here... and... I think it falls in the category of "humans not being their best selves."  It's an example of how humans can manipulate information, presenting it in a way that benefits them but not the larger community.

That's my intro and now here we go:

Before the December 2012 Legislative Analyst Report, "Restructuring California's Adult Education System," and a few months after the June 2011 Little Hoover Report on Adult Education, and some years after Wall Street decisions caused international economic chaos in 2008 and Schwartzenegger decided to respond to said chaos by "flexing" Adult School money and making it available to K12 Districts so they could survive....

While we were in the midst of dealing with chaos in our public education system... cuts to all branches and cost increases for colleges and universities... 

K12 Adult Schools K12 Districts were presented as hostile to Adult Education in a resolution by the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges....  

and it was recommended - by the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - that Adult Ed be put in the Community College system.    (The resolution is in full below and I will go through it, point by point.)

Wow - Community Colleges saying that K12 Districts are basically bad places for Adult Ed to be and all Adult Ed should be put inside the Community College system.  Wow.  Why?

Before we get into that, you might want to know: What's the Academic Senate for California Community College?

The Community College Academic Senate is basically the voice of Community College faculty for statewide policy.  It's sort of like a really big student council but teachers and for the whole state.  And just for Community Colleges. 

(By the way, K12 Adult School teachers don't have one of these.  Maybe it would have been helpful if we had. Something to think about.)

And then, you might want to know:  What's a resolution?

It's a recommendation.  That's basically it.  A suggestion.  It's not a law.  It's not a bill that could become a law.  It's a formal suggestion that people have thought about and talked about and voted on as their official position on something.

Okay, now we can get into it.  Here's the 2011 resolution with my comments in italics:

Assign Responsibility for Adult Education to California Community Colleges

Fall 2011
Resolution Number: 06.03
Contact: Esther Matthew
Assigned to : President
Topic:  State and Legislative Issues
Status: Assigned
 
Whereas, The responsibility for adult education in California is inconsistently applied throughout the state, in some cases being assumed by the K-12 system and in others by community colleges;

(Adult Education has been delivered by K12 Adult School since 1868.  By Community Colleges, for much less.  "We've been here before," a powerpoint history of Adult Education in California, is a good thing to review at this point.)

Whereas, The K-12 system has shifted millions of dollars in adult education funds to support other K-12 categorical programs that had experienced deep funding cuts, leading to a transfer of more than $400 million out of adult education programs;

(I'm not sure what they're talking about here.  Most of the categoricals were flexed.  A few were not.  I will do my homework and find out which weren't.  The Adult Ed money that was flexed and used by districts did not so much go to "support other categoricals" as simply go to keep K12 Districts going.  All public education was under great stress.  Adult Ed money might have gone to pay a teacher's salary or to buy books or to clean the cafeteria or to pay for school buses.  Basically, it just kept public K12 schools going.  A sad thing, yes.  Sad that we that the whole financial collapse happened in the first place.  Sad that public education has been struggling since Prop 13 and was finally brought to its knees by the financial collapse.  But a bad thing that K12 schools survived?  No.  And if Adult Ed money had gone to prop up Community Colleges, I doubt the Academic Senate would have thought this was bad.  But it didn't help Community Colleges.  It helped K12 Schools.)

Whereas, The California Community Colleges Task Force on Student Success (established in response to Senate Bill 1143, Liu, 2010) draft recommendations (as of September 30, 2011) indicate that the State of California should develop a comprehensive strategy for addressing basic skills instruction, including providing for adult education; and

(Many people who work in Community Colleges are not happy with all the Task Force recommendations as you will see in this video:



I support the people in this video, by the way.  I support their cause.  I'm using the video to demonstrate a point:  When it comes to these official recommendation things, people often pull out the parts they like and present them in isolation. 

When it works to their advantage, great, mention it.  When it doesn't, protest the part you don't like separately.   But don't present things in context.  Don't look at and remind people of the whole. 

Again, I have nothing against the folks in this video.  And they aren't the Academic Senate.  I'm just pointing out that the Task Force Recommendations are complicated and folks in Community Colleges - teachers, admin, students - feel all kinds of ways about the various recommendations. 

I understand.  Sometimes I like parts of something and don't like other parts.  But if so, I need to be honest and state that somewhere.  Otherwise, it's more or less "manipulating data" or in this case, recommendations.

The Task Force Recommendations are their own big thing.  They have had a huge impact.  They are another big piece of the puzzle of Public Education changes.  I am not going to try cover that piece here.)

Whereas, California community colleges are best suited to provide adult education throughout the state but cannot properly fulfill this function due to budgetary constraints;

Okay, basically my response to this is "Says who?"    I mean, really, who says that Community Colleges are best suited for delivering Adult Education?  

Okay, let's think about that for a minute.  What has been everyone's feeling on who thinks Adult Ed should be delivered by Community Colleges - they do it best....

Some community colleges thought so - not all of them.

The Governor thought so.  That's a biggie. He's not "the people" but he's their leader and he's a strong leader who is not afraid of using his veto power plus he writes the budget.

The LAO - Legislative Analyst Office - didn't think so. They recommended some changes - many of which I don't personally like. But they thought the two programs should continue on and they thought K12 Adult Schools should regain categorical status once the smoke of flex cleared.

A lot of students and teachers and admin at K12 Adult Schools didn't think so.

Some teachers and admin at K12 Adult Schools thought so because they didn't like their K12 Districts and how those districts were dealing with the economic downturn.  I'm just going to come right out and say that some people - not all! - in LA thought Adult Ed would be better off in Community Colleges... and now that all this stuff is coming out about the ipad wheelings and dealings... maybe what the real trouble was and always is:  K12 Districts which do things badly or have some corruption going on... create problems.  Same thing is true of Community Colleges.  Or Universities.  Or anything!  We are back to the truth that human beings are capable of both help and harm.  Which is why it is good to have structures that account for both and encourage the former and discourage the latter. Because let's face it:  crap happens.  And as a third generation public school teacher and as a human being, I will tell you:  Crap happens in schools.  And in business.  And in hospitals.  And in homes.  I mean, again... we are human beings!  We're not nice all the time!

But mostly... and I think I can be pretty safe in saying this because I have been working on all this for over 5 years now and over the course of that time, have talked to people around the state...  mostly the K12 Adult School students and teachers and admin and surrounding communities liked their K12 Adult Schools.  They just wanted them to have secure funding again.  The problem was not the schools.  The problem was the funding.  And the funding connects back to that huge economic mess and one could even argue, goes all the way back to Prop 13.  And that is why I don't like losing our broad mission.  Because I think it is important to see ourselves as a community.  And not think college and career readiness and money and business is the answer to every human problem.  Business actually creates some problems.  I mean, let's remember:  Wall Street is a business!  The people working there who made the decisions they made were very college and career ready!  Life is not just about making money!  Life is about the choices you make with the resources you have - including money, energy, people, intelligence, heart, etc.  We are a river that needs two banks - and only one of them has dollars in it.  Social emotional intelligence and health matters.  Strong, resilient communities matter.  They are part of what creates an economy that benefits the group and not just a very small portion of it.   Did I digress?  Yes and no.  This whole thing - this whole adventure - is about reshaping Adult Education, which is a structure.  And the only way you can build a good structure is to truly know what you are creating it for - to see the natural shape of something and then create a form which supports it in the healthiest and most beautiful way possible.  So really... all this reshaping Adult Education... and all public education... is about how we see ourselves. 

That's the truth and it's not said out loud real often.  But it's the truth.  We are arguing about who and what we are... a vision shaped by our own perceptions...  perceptions colored by our capacity and character...  Are we willing and able to see things we don't like?  Are we willing and able to see things that are painful to realize or address?  Are we willing and able to see solutions which might not be of great benefit to us personally or to ourselves, alone?  Are we willing and able to share what we see with others?  Publically? Are we willing to take the heat for speaking up when others fear to?   Are we willing to speak up for something which might be reviled?  Are we willing to advocate for people the larger culture ignores or denies or rejects?  Are we willing to put forth solutions which might be rejected?   All these questions - and of course, their answers - shape we're going as a people. 

Our personal decisions to see or not see... speak or not speak... shape our collective future.


Back to what Brown sees as a solution...  Brown didn't support Prop 13 and he didn't flex categoricals.  Previous administrations did both. He was left holding the hot potato.

And when given a hot potato, what do most people want to do with it?  Pass it on! 

It's hard to sit with a problem you did not create and try to tease out what caused the problem and then slowly and wisely think through what solutions might solve it.

I think "give Adult Ed to the Community Colleges" is a hot potato solution.  It sounds good.  But it doesn't really solve the problem.  It doesn't even just pass it on.  It actually makes things worse.  But...  again... human beings!  We don't always think things through.  (Me, too!)


Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges recommend that the Board of Governors urge the Legislature to assign responsibility for adult education to the California community colleges but only if sufficient funding to address this mission is provided.

MSC
Appendix A: California Community Colleges Task Force on Student Success


Lessons and questions:

1.  What weight did this have with people?  With Legislators?  With the Governor?  With various agencies and commissions and so forth?  It obviously did not have a lot of weight with the LAO because the LAO recommended the opposite.  The LAO also pushed for narrowing the mission... something mirrored in the Task Force recommendations for the Community College system also... the whole push for College and Career Readiness versus "community"... which mostly, CC folks are not happy about...  My takeaway:  The resolution probably had some weight.  They thought about things.  They came to a decision about what they wanted. They spoke up.  Speaking up is good.  But other people also thought about things and many said, "No.  We don't agree with you."

2.  Why the heck did they think they could say that Community Colleges are "best suited"?  Can you just say that something is best suited without real proof?  What did they base on that on?  It always boggles my mind how people can be so bold.  On the other hand, being bold has its benefits. In any case, I disagree with them.  As do many people.  Some of whom I disagree with on many other points!  I always love what CDE Superintendent Tom Torlakson said about the whole put Adult Ed inside Community Colleges thing:  "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"   Thank you, Tom.

3.  Ideas are the beginning of everything.  Never think that your idea doesn't matter.  It matters.  A lot.  Really, we're all just operating on a lot of collective ideas - yes, that and gravity, and water and oxygen and rocks and plants and animals, I know.  There are "real" things.  But if we were all operating on just "real" things, then human culture would be the same across time and space.  And it isn't.  Because our ideas... what  we decide matters.. our perceptions... change.   A good idea... a timely idea...  well expressed... can change everything.   It just takes time - and energy.  But that's where everything begins.

4.  That's why I think it's so important to really think about these things.  Education is the hand that rocks the cultural cradle.  We're reshaping public education.  Okay.  But how?  Who is that baby in the cradle?  What sort of people do we want them to grow up to be?  Education - how much, how little, for whom, to what purpose - shapes our future.

What do we want?

When we look into the future, what do we see?

Who's doing the looking and what shapes how they see things?

What's the past of the people shaping the future?

A lot of "I's" shape a we.

Past, present, and future - who are they?  And what do they see?


At what point do we wake up and smell the coffee?





 

Jumat, 22 Agustus 2014

adult history The Truth Is K12 Adult Schools Need Dedicated Funding - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Action Step, Artikel Budget, Artikel CCAE, Artikel Designated Funding Stream, Artikel Grassroots, Artikel How Things Work, Artikel K-12 Adult Ed, Artikel LAO, Artikel Public Education, Artikel Regional Consortia, Artikel Think About It, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history The Truth Is K12 Adult Schools Need Dedicated Funding - japraklupo
link : adult history The Truth Is K12 Adult Schools Need Dedicated Funding - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

The December 2012 LAO - Legislative Analyst Office - Report on Adult Education has served in many ways as a template for reform in Adult Education.

(Click here to read the report:  Restructuring California's Adult Education System.)

But one important recommendation - to reinstate Adult Education as a categorical when flexibility ends in June of 2015 - has been ignored.

Reinstating Adult Ed as a categorical may or may not be a viable option.  Many think it's not politically possible. 

But the ever-increasing number of signatures on the Restore Protected Funding for K-12 Adult Education Petition, CCAE's Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar, and grassroots action around the state all make one thing clear:

K12 Adult Education needs a stable source of funding separate from the community college system.

Within the Regional Consortia system, both Community Colleges and K12 Adult Schools are mandated to provide Adult Education, but only Community Colleges have secure funding. And they will continue to have secure funding because their funding exists independent of the Regional Consortia system.  They have apportionment (this is what their funding is called).  They are secure.  On top of their apportionment money, they may get extra money for Adult Education - which may come in through the Community College Chancellor's Office.

K12 Adult Schools are not secure.  K12 Adult Schools are not safe.  K12 Adult Schools have been mandated to do a job but haven't been given the means to do the job and can't properly prepare to do it, given the fact they don't know what the future holds.

This is the plain truth.
 
It is a also a truth some folks have danced around when asked to explain how K12 Adult Schools can survive this challenge.  And it is a truth that has sometimes created division amongst Adult Ed advocates in their desperation to figure out a way to save K12 Adult Schools.

It is not, however, a truth which K12 Adult Schools or their advocates created.

It is just a truth they must face...  that K12 Adult Schools, themselves, need stabilizing if they are to continue on as the stabilizing fourth leg of California's Public Education system.


In what form that stability will come - a return to categorical status, some new form of dedicated funding specific to K12 Adult Schools, or some other way - we don't know. 

We just know if it doesn't happen, more K12 Adult Schools will collapse, which will destabilize our public education system, economy, and social stability.

This December 2012 Edsource article provides helpful information.   I've highlighted the section with quotes from Paul Steenhausen, who wrote the LAO Report.

California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office says the state’s embattled adult education system needs a dedicated and permanent funding stream that can’t be appropriated for other school programs when the state budget goes south.
 
Restructuring California’s Adult Education System calls for the state Legislature to restore adult education as a categorical program. Adult Ed advocates lauded the proposal, even though it relies on funding that is speculative and requires a commitment from legislators and Gov. Jerry Brown that they have so far not shown.
 
Adult schools are an important strand in the state’s safety net, offering community-based classes to some of the state’s neediest adults, ranging from the unemployed, the disabled and the elderly to ex-offenders reentering society, immigrants trying to learn English and become citizens, and high school dropouts seeking to earn their GEDs.
 
Until the 2008-09 academic year, adult education was funded through one of the dozens of categorical programs that could be used only for their stated purpose. But as part of the February 2009 state budget plan, legislators approved what’s known as “categorical flex,” giving school districts the authority to use funds from 40 categorical programs, including adult education, for any educational purpose.
Chris Nelson, State President of the California Council for Adult Education. Photo courtesy CCAE. (Click to enlarge)
The LAO report says that move signaled “adult schools’ lower priority within the K-12 system.” Since then, local school boards have funneled as much as 70 percent of statewide adult ed funds to support K-12 programs, according to Chris Nelson, president of the California Council for Adult Education.

At least 35 programs have shut down as a result, and many of the 300 remaining programs are operating on shoestring budgets. Altogether, the LAO estimates that in 2011-12, the state and federal governments spent about $400 million on district-run adult schools, down from $854 million before flex started.

Many community colleges also offer adult education classes, spending about $1.7 billion last year, according to the LAO, but the colleges take that money from their regular state funding and not from separate categorical accounts.

Categorical flex is due to expire at the end of the 2014-15 school year, and the LAO is recommending that starting in 2015-16 adult education be restored as a categorical program with a dedicated funding stream. The program is a good candidate for restoration of funds, said Paul Steenhausen, who wrote the LAO report, because it reaches a distinct, underserved population.



“Adult education is a different animal,” Steenhausen said. Because it doesn’t serve K-12 students, it is “fundamentally different from other categoricals.”

However, many observers believe that the current level of flexible funding will continue beyond 2014-15 unless Gov. Brown convinces the Legislature to reconfigure the school finance system using a weighted student formula (WSF). Under this approach, money would follow the student, so schools enrolling students with greater needs, such as English learners and those from low-income families, would receive more funds. When Gov. Brown first proposed WSF last January, he didn’t support separate funding for adult education, leading advocates to oppose it.

Even the recent passage of Proposition 30, which increases funding to schools through a combination of a small sales tax increase and higher income taxes on the wealthiest Californians, has not revived support for adult education, according to Nelson.

“We’re still hearing that programs are being threatened with being cut more,” Nelson said. “I have not heard of anybody who has said they’re going to get an increase because of Prop. 30.”
Roadmap to restructuring Adult Ed, California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (Click to enlarge)
Instead, Nelson said he believes that school districts will be under pressure to use increased revenues to provide raises for teachers. “We’re all fighting for every little dollar, and it’s unfortunate how this has played out – one program against another.”

Nelson described the situation in Sonoma County, which had 11 adult education schools a few years ago, but has only one remaining program, in Petaluma. That program is being inundated by prospective students from all over the county. Nelson expects that Petaluma, which doesn’t have the capacity to serve so many people, will soon have to restrict its program to city residents.

One reason adult education may lack support from some legislators is the program’s uneven distribution across the state. Adult ed schools are more common in urban than rural communities.
The LAO report addresses this issue. The LAO is predicting that as the economy improves, the state will soon be receiving more funds that must be spent on K-14 education. The report recommends that some of this new money should be allocated to adult education based on regional needs and the ability of districts, colleges and local businesses to work as a team to avoid duplication of services and provide smooth pathways for students to jobs and college. The LAO also recommends that funding be allocated based on student outcomes – such as how many successfully complete courses – the way federal funds are now distributed.

But, finally, “the bigger issue is how is adult ed going to get funded,” Nelson said. “The LAO does recommend designated funding for adult ed, and that’s very key.”

The December 2012 LAO - Legislative Analyst Office - Report on Adult Education has served in many ways as a template for reform in Adult Education.

(Click here to read the report:  Restructuring California's Adult Education System.)

But one important recommendation - to reinstate Adult Education as a categorical when flexibility ends in June of 2015 - has been ignored.

Reinstating Adult Ed as a categorical may or may not be a viable option.  Many think it's not politically possible. 

But the ever-increasing number of signatures on the Restore Protected Funding for K-12 Adult Education Petition, CCAE's Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar, and grassroots action around the state all make one thing clear:

K12 Adult Education needs a stable source of funding separate from the community college system.

Within the Regional Consortia system, both Community Colleges and K12 Adult Schools are mandated to provide Adult Education, but only Community Colleges have secure funding. And they will continue to have secure funding because their funding exists independent of the Regional Consortia system.  They have apportionment (this is what their funding is called).  They are secure.  On top of their apportionment money, they may get extra money for Adult Education - which may come in through the Community College Chancellor's Office.

K12 Adult Schools are not secure.  K12 Adult Schools are not safe.  K12 Adult Schools have been mandated to do a job but haven't been given the means to do the job and can't properly prepare to do it, given the fact they don't know what the future holds.

This is the plain truth.
 
It is a also a truth some folks have danced around when asked to explain how K12 Adult Schools can survive this challenge.  And it is a truth that has sometimes created division amongst Adult Ed advocates in their desperation to figure out a way to save K12 Adult Schools.

It is not, however, a truth which K12 Adult Schools or their advocates created.

It is just a truth they must face...  that K12 Adult Schools, themselves, need stabilizing if they are to continue on as the stabilizing fourth leg of California's Public Education system.


In what form that stability will come - a return to categorical status, some new form of dedicated funding specific to K12 Adult Schools, or some other way - we don't know. 

We just know if it doesn't happen, more K12 Adult Schools will collapse, which will destabilize our public education system, economy, and social stability.

This December 2012 Edsource article provides helpful information.   I've highlighted the section with quotes from Paul Steenhausen, who wrote the LAO Report.


California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office says the state’s embattled adult education system needs a dedicated and permanent funding stream that can’t be appropriated for other school programs when the state budget goes south.
 
Restructuring California’s Adult Education System calls for the state Legislature to restore adult education as a categorical program. Adult Ed advocates lauded the proposal, even though it relies on funding that is speculative and requires a commitment from legislators and Gov. Jerry Brown that they have so far not shown.
 
Adult schools are an important strand in the state’s safety net, offering community-based classes to some of the state’s neediest adults, ranging from the unemployed, the disabled and the elderly to ex-offenders reentering society, immigrants trying to learn English and become citizens, and high school dropouts seeking to earn their GEDs.
 
Until the 2008-09 academic year, adult education was funded through one of the dozens of categorical programs that could be used only for their stated purpose. But as part of the February 2009 state budget plan, legislators approved what’s known as “categorical flex,” giving school districts the authority to use funds from 40 categorical programs, including adult education, for any educational purpose.
Chris Nelson, State President of the California Council for Adult Education. Photo courtesy CCAE. (Click to enlarge)
The LAO report says that move signaled “adult schools’ lower priority within the K-12 system.” Since then, local school boards have funneled as much as 70 percent of statewide adult ed funds to support K-12 programs, according to Chris Nelson, president of the California Council for Adult Education.

At least 35 programs have shut down as a result, and many of the 300 remaining programs are operating on shoestring budgets. Altogether, the LAO estimates that in 2011-12, the state and federal governments spent about $400 million on district-run adult schools, down from $854 million before flex started.

Many community colleges also offer adult education classes, spending about $1.7 billion last year, according to the LAO, but the colleges take that money from their regular state funding and not from separate categorical accounts.

Categorical flex is due to expire at the end of the 2014-15 school year, and the LAO is recommending that starting in 2015-16 adult education be restored as a categorical program with a dedicated funding stream. The program is a good candidate for restoration of funds, said Paul Steenhausen, who wrote the LAO report, because it reaches a distinct, underserved population.



“Adult education is a different animal,” Steenhausen said. Because it doesn’t serve K-12 students, it is “fundamentally different from other categoricals.”

However, many observers believe that the current level of flexible funding will continue beyond 2014-15 unless Gov. Brown convinces the Legislature to reconfigure the school finance system using a weighted student formula (WSF). Under this approach, money would follow the student, so schools enrolling students with greater needs, such as English learners and those from low-income families, would receive more funds. When Gov. Brown first proposed WSF last January, he didn’t support separate funding for adult education, leading advocates to oppose it.

Even the recent passage of Proposition 30, which increases funding to schools through a combination of a small sales tax increase and higher income taxes on the wealthiest Californians, has not revived support for adult education, according to Nelson.

“We’re still hearing that programs are being threatened with being cut more,” Nelson said. “I have not heard of anybody who has said they’re going to get an increase because of Prop. 30.”
Roadmap to restructuring Adult Ed, California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (Click to enlarge)
Instead, Nelson said he believes that school districts will be under pressure to use increased revenues to provide raises for teachers. “We’re all fighting for every little dollar, and it’s unfortunate how this has played out – one program against another.”

Nelson described the situation in Sonoma County, which had 11 adult education schools a few years ago, but has only one remaining program, in Petaluma. That program is being inundated by prospective students from all over the county. Nelson expects that Petaluma, which doesn’t have the capacity to serve so many people, will soon have to restrict its program to city residents.

One reason adult education may lack support from some legislators is the program’s uneven distribution across the state. Adult ed schools are more common in urban than rural communities.
The LAO report addresses this issue. The LAO is predicting that as the economy improves, the state will soon be receiving more funds that must be spent on K-14 education. The report recommends that some of this new money should be allocated to adult education based on regional needs and the ability of districts, colleges and local businesses to work as a team to avoid duplication of services and provide smooth pathways for students to jobs and college. The LAO also recommends that funding be allocated based on student outcomes – such as how many successfully complete courses – the way federal funds are now distributed.

But, finally, “the bigger issue is how is adult ed going to get funded,” Nelson said. “The LAO does recommend designated funding for adult ed, and that’s very key.”

Selasa, 19 Agustus 2014

adult history K12 Adult Schools: Blueprints for Civic Action - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Affirming Adult Ed, Artikel Civics, Artikel Cuts and closures, Artikel ESL, Artikel Flexibility, Artikel GED and HS Diploma, Artikel K-12 Adult Ed, Artikel Older Adults, Artikel Parent Ed, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history K12 Adult Schools: Blueprints for Civic Action - japraklupo
link : adult history K12 Adult Schools: Blueprints for Civic Action - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

This week the Final Report of the K-12 Task Force on California Civic Learning was released.

The purpose of the California Task Force on K-12 Civic Learning, co-chaired by Justice Judith McConnell and Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools David Gordon, was to ensure that Californians have the skills to participate in work, community, and civic life in the 21st century.

I was struck by the title: "Revitalizing K-12 Civic Learning in California:  A Blueprint for Action."
In so many ways, K-12 Adult Schools, in both form and function, are just such a blueprint.

Hit the "read more" link to learn why.


K-12 Adults Schools are rooted in community.  They see and serve their students as part of a larger community - parents of school-age children, employees at a workplace, members of families, extended families, and neighborhoods.  Many classes are held "off-site" on K-12 campuses, job sites, church basements, and senior centers.  Students are encouraged to be active participants in their communities, to broaden their connections and increase their involvement in larger circles, to deepen their understanding of the larger world in which communities intersect, and to become leaders who forge connections between communities and build new and inclusive ones.

In response to the cuts and closures of the last five years, K-12 Adult Schools responded just as you would expect them to, given this orientation.  They educated themselves, each other, and the larger community, using the skills they developed as a school community to bring their message to the world.  Leaders emerged and coalitions formed.  K-12 Adult School Students held rallies and press conferences, gathered signatures on petitions, wrote Legislators and Governor Brown, attended School Board Meetings, visited elected officials, wrote Letters to the Editor, invited the press and local officials to their classrooms, held workshops, attended conferences, and spread the message that Adult Education matters on t-shirts, buttons, bumper stickers, and social media.   The K-12 Adult School response to the devastation of flexibility is a blueprint for action that should be shared around the world.  That's how good it is.

Here is the Executive Summary of the Report, along with my highlights and comments in italics.


A Blueprint For Action

The success of our nation and state depends on educated, informed and active citizens and residents. However, we are not preparing our diverse residents with the civic knowledge, skills and values they need to succeed in college, career and civic life. A few sobering facts tell the story. The United States recently ranked 139th in voter participation of 172 democracies around the world, and less than half of eligible young people ages 18-24 voted in the 2012 elections. Just 13 percent of high school seniors showed a solid understanding of U.S. History in the same year, and nearly half of Americans who participated in a 2011 Pew study said states’ rights, rather than slavery, was the main cause of the Civil War. In California, less than 50 percent of high school seniors surveyed viewed being actively involved in state and local issues as their responsibility.

Adult Schools serve the immigrant parents of K-12 students, parents who may not be familiar with US civics. EL-Civics - English Learner Civics - helps immigrants learn not only English but the skills needed to be active community members and citizens.

Adult Schools also serve young adults seeking GEDs, high school diplomas, and job skills.  This second group has a low history of low-voter turnout. Adult Schools educate young adults and support them in engaging in civic life.  

This AEM post provides more data on education level and voter turnout

The education system has a central role in equitably cultivating the qualities that will enable our youth to mature and participate in our society. Indeed, states across the nation have long held the view that schools have a strong civic mission. And yet, in recent years this mission has been neglected. This neglect is due to a variety of factors, including decades of shifting federal and state education policies that have sought to improve education quality overall but have generally left civic learning by the wayside in the process. In spite of these factors, there are examples of high quality, balanced civic learning in California schools, but they are the exception, not the rule. To change this, all of us can and must do our part.

Adult Schools are leading the way!  Adult Schools have never forgotten their mission as described by the California Department of Education:

"The Adult Education programs address the unique and evolving needs of individuals and communities by providing adults with the knowledge and skills necessary to participate effectively as productive citizens, workers, and family members."

We have much to gain by revitalizing civic learning. The chief benefits of civic learning are a vibrant and informed civic life and democracy and a healthy society. High-quality civic learning also helps teach children skills they need for the 21st century workplace, such as critical thinking, problem solving, communication, collaboration, creativity, initiative and innovation. In addition, civic learning done right engages students by making what they learn at school more relevant to real life. It promotes academic achievement, as well, and prevents some students from dropping out.

Civic learning is vital for our increasingly diverse California society. In 2012-2013, our 6.2 million K-12 students were 53 percent Latino, 26 percent white, 9 percent Asian and 6 percent African American, with the remaining 6 percent comprised of other ethnicities. In addition, an increasing number of our students are not native speakers of English. Almost 4 in 10 kindergarteners are English language learners. This diversity, and the attention it requires, is now acknowledged in our school funding model. The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) recognizes the necessity of investing in the reduction and ultimate removal of inequitable outcomes in California public schools. Revitalizing civic learning opportunities, in an equitable manner, can contribute to meeting these goals.

K-12 Adult Schools are uniquely suited to support those children by offering the families ESL, EL-Civics (English Learner Civics), Citizenship, Parent Education, and Family Literacy classes, often on the actual school site of the children, sometimes with childcare. 

There has never been a better—or a more crucial—time to revitalize civic learning in California.
As a nation, we already know how to do civic learning well. Research has demonstrated that six core activities—known as the Six Proven Practices in Civic Learning—directly improve the quality and effectiveness of civic learning in schools. These practices are: classroom instruction in government, history, law and economics; service learning projects tied to the curriculum; simulations of democratic processes; extracurricular activities that have a strong civic dimension; student participation in school governance, and discussions of current events and controversial topics.

K-12 Adult Education has long prided itself on using just such methods. 

The San Mateo Adult School ESL program, for example, encourages vital classroom discussion, community involvement, student advocacy, and self-governance through the ESL Student Council. 

There has never been a better—or a more crucial—time to revitalize civic learning in California. Our state is in the midst of several major public education reforms, including implementing the Common Core State Standards in mathematics and English language arts. We are also undergoing a profound shift in the way that K-12 education is funded, via the new LCFF. As we in California implement these sweeping systemic changes, it is critical that we not leave civic learning behind. To this end, the Task Force makes the following system-wide recommendations to improve civic learning in every district, in every school, for every child.

• Revise the California History-Social Science Content Standards and accompanying curriculum frameworks to incorporate an emphasis on civic learning, starting in kindergarten, so all students acquire the civic knowledge, skills and values they need to succeed in college, career and civic life.

• Integrate civic learning into state assessment and accountability systems for students, schools and districts. Civic knowledge, skills, values and whether students are receiving learning opportunities that promote these outcomes must be assessed and linked to revised California History-Social Science Content Standards and relevant Common Core State Standards. This will enable periodic reporting to the legislature and the public on the state of students’ civic learning.

• Improve professional learning experiences for teachers and administrators to help them implement civic learning in schools. Connect professional learning in civics to Common Core State Standards professional learning experiences.

• Develop an articulated sequence of instruction in civic learning across all of K-12, pegged to revised standards. At each grade level, civic learning should draw on the research-based Six Proven Practices listed above and include work that is action-oriented and project-based and that develops digital literacy.

Digital literacy is yet another focus of K-12 Adult Education.  Digital literacy classes specifically for ESL parents are one example.  Online and Distance Learning is another.

• Establish a communication mechanism so community stakeholders can easily connect with teachers and students on civic education and engagement. Students need to get out of the school building to practice civic engagement, and civic leaders need to come into schools to engage students.

Sounds like the advocacy work so many K-12 Adult Schools are engaged in!

• Provide incentives for local school districts to fund civic learning in Local Control Accountability Plans under the new LCFF.

These recommendations constitute a comprehensive plan. The report that follows describes the context and rationale in more detail, elaborates on the recommendations, shares civic learning success stories from around the state and provides suggestions for actions we all can take immediately to dramatically improve the quality of civic learning in our schools.


Learn more about the need for civic engagement and education here.

This week the Final Report of the K-12 Task Force on California Civic Learning was released.

The purpose of the California Task Force on K-12 Civic Learning, co-chaired by Justice Judith McConnell and Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools David Gordon, was to ensure that Californians have the skills to participate in work, community, and civic life in the 21st century.

I was struck by the title: "Revitalizing K-12 Civic Learning in California:  A Blueprint for Action."
In so many ways, K-12 Adult Schools, in both form and function, are just such a blueprint.

Hit the "read more" link to learn why.


K-12 Adults Schools are rooted in community.  They see and serve their students as part of a larger community - parents of school-age children, employees at a workplace, members of families, extended families, and neighborhoods.  Many classes are held "off-site" on K-12 campuses, job sites, church basements, and senior centers.  Students are encouraged to be active participants in their communities, to broaden their connections and increase their involvement in larger circles, to deepen their understanding of the larger world in which communities intersect, and to become leaders who forge connections between communities and build new and inclusive ones.

In response to the cuts and closures of the last five years, K-12 Adult Schools responded just as you would expect them to, given this orientation.  They educated themselves, each other, and the larger community, using the skills they developed as a school community to bring their message to the world.  Leaders emerged and coalitions formed.  K-12 Adult School Students held rallies and press conferences, gathered signatures on petitions, wrote Legislators and Governor Brown, attended School Board Meetings, visited elected officials, wrote Letters to the Editor, invited the press and local officials to their classrooms, held workshops, attended conferences, and spread the message that Adult Education matters on t-shirts, buttons, bumper stickers, and social media.   The K-12 Adult School response to the devastation of flexibility is a blueprint for action that should be shared around the world.  That's how good it is.

Here is the Executive Summary of the Report, along with my highlights and comments in italics.


A Blueprint For Action

The success of our nation and state depends on educated, informed and active citizens and residents. However, we are not preparing our diverse residents with the civic knowledge, skills and values they need to succeed in college, career and civic life. A few sobering facts tell the story. The United States recently ranked 139th in voter participation of 172 democracies around the world, and less than half of eligible young people ages 18-24 voted in the 2012 elections. Just 13 percent of high school seniors showed a solid understanding of U.S. History in the same year, and nearly half of Americans who participated in a 2011 Pew study said states’ rights, rather than slavery, was the main cause of the Civil War. In California, less than 50 percent of high school seniors surveyed viewed being actively involved in state and local issues as their responsibility.

Adult Schools serve the immigrant parents of K-12 students, parents who may not be familiar with US civics. EL-Civics - English Learner Civics - helps immigrants learn not only English but the skills needed to be active community members and citizens.

Adult Schools also serve young adults seeking GEDs, high school diplomas, and job skills.  This second group has a low history of low-voter turnout. Adult Schools educate young adults and support them in engaging in civic life.  

This AEM post provides more data on education level and voter turnout

The education system has a central role in equitably cultivating the qualities that will enable our youth to mature and participate in our society. Indeed, states across the nation have long held the view that schools have a strong civic mission. And yet, in recent years this mission has been neglected. This neglect is due to a variety of factors, including decades of shifting federal and state education policies that have sought to improve education quality overall but have generally left civic learning by the wayside in the process. In spite of these factors, there are examples of high quality, balanced civic learning in California schools, but they are the exception, not the rule. To change this, all of us can and must do our part.

Adult Schools are leading the way!  Adult Schools have never forgotten their mission as described by the California Department of Education:

"The Adult Education programs address the unique and evolving needs of individuals and communities by providing adults with the knowledge and skills necessary to participate effectively as productive citizens, workers, and family members."

We have much to gain by revitalizing civic learning. The chief benefits of civic learning are a vibrant and informed civic life and democracy and a healthy society. High-quality civic learning also helps teach children skills they need for the 21st century workplace, such as critical thinking, problem solving, communication, collaboration, creativity, initiative and innovation. In addition, civic learning done right engages students by making what they learn at school more relevant to real life. It promotes academic achievement, as well, and prevents some students from dropping out.

Civic learning is vital for our increasingly diverse California society. In 2012-2013, our 6.2 million K-12 students were 53 percent Latino, 26 percent white, 9 percent Asian and 6 percent African American, with the remaining 6 percent comprised of other ethnicities. In addition, an increasing number of our students are not native speakers of English. Almost 4 in 10 kindergarteners are English language learners. This diversity, and the attention it requires, is now acknowledged in our school funding model. The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) recognizes the necessity of investing in the reduction and ultimate removal of inequitable outcomes in California public schools. Revitalizing civic learning opportunities, in an equitable manner, can contribute to meeting these goals.

K-12 Adult Schools are uniquely suited to support those children by offering the families ESL, EL-Civics (English Learner Civics), Citizenship, Parent Education, and Family Literacy classes, often on the actual school site of the children, sometimes with childcare. 

There has never been a better—or a more crucial—time to revitalize civic learning in California.
As a nation, we already know how to do civic learning well. Research has demonstrated that six core activities—known as the Six Proven Practices in Civic Learning—directly improve the quality and effectiveness of civic learning in schools. These practices are: classroom instruction in government, history, law and economics; service learning projects tied to the curriculum; simulations of democratic processes; extracurricular activities that have a strong civic dimension; student participation in school governance, and discussions of current events and controversial topics.

K-12 Adult Education has long prided itself on using just such methods. 

The San Mateo Adult School ESL program, for example, encourages vital classroom discussion, community involvement, student advocacy, and self-governance through the ESL Student Council. 

There has never been a better—or a more crucial—time to revitalize civic learning in California. Our state is in the midst of several major public education reforms, including implementing the Common Core State Standards in mathematics and English language arts. We are also undergoing a profound shift in the way that K-12 education is funded, via the new LCFF. As we in California implement these sweeping systemic changes, it is critical that we not leave civic learning behind. To this end, the Task Force makes the following system-wide recommendations to improve civic learning in every district, in every school, for every child.

• Revise the California History-Social Science Content Standards and accompanying curriculum frameworks to incorporate an emphasis on civic learning, starting in kindergarten, so all students acquire the civic knowledge, skills and values they need to succeed in college, career and civic life.

• Integrate civic learning into state assessment and accountability systems for students, schools and districts. Civic knowledge, skills, values and whether students are receiving learning opportunities that promote these outcomes must be assessed and linked to revised California History-Social Science Content Standards and relevant Common Core State Standards. This will enable periodic reporting to the legislature and the public on the state of students’ civic learning.

• Improve professional learning experiences for teachers and administrators to help them implement civic learning in schools. Connect professional learning in civics to Common Core State Standards professional learning experiences.

• Develop an articulated sequence of instruction in civic learning across all of K-12, pegged to revised standards. At each grade level, civic learning should draw on the research-based Six Proven Practices listed above and include work that is action-oriented and project-based and that develops digital literacy.

Digital literacy is yet another focus of K-12 Adult Education.  Digital literacy classes specifically for ESL parents are one example.  Online and Distance Learning is another.

• Establish a communication mechanism so community stakeholders can easily connect with teachers and students on civic education and engagement. Students need to get out of the school building to practice civic engagement, and civic leaders need to come into schools to engage students.

Sounds like the advocacy work so many K-12 Adult Schools are engaged in!

• Provide incentives for local school districts to fund civic learning in Local Control Accountability Plans under the new LCFF.

These recommendations constitute a comprehensive plan. The report that follows describes the context and rationale in more detail, elaborates on the recommendations, shares civic learning success stories from around the state and provides suggestions for actions we all can take immediately to dramatically improve the quality of civic learning in our schools.


Learn more about the need for civic engagement and education here.

adult history Include Teachers in the RC Planning Process - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Regional Consortia, Artikel Teachers, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Include Teachers in the RC Planning Process - japraklupo
link : adult history Include Teachers in the RC Planning Process - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

 
 
 
 
Here is a letter to CDE (California Department of Education) Superintendent from the presidents of the two largest teachers unions, CFT (California Federation of Teachers) and CTA (California Teachers Association) urging him to include teachers in the planning process for the new Regional Consortia system.
 
The letter is from April of 2014 - so it is not new - but I had not included it on this blog before and one purpose of the blog is to be a library of information which others can use in our work to save and rebuild Adult Education, especially K12 Adult Schools. 

 
 


Adult Education, like every branch of public education but even more so, is being re-formed.  It is being pruned and trimmed so that it grows in new directions.
 
Because public education is for the public and paid for by the public, we all need to be in on what is happening.   Including teachers is one way to make sure that happens.

 
 
 
 
Here is a letter to CDE (California Department of Education) Superintendent from the presidents of the two largest teachers unions, CFT (California Federation of Teachers) and CTA (California Teachers Association) urging him to include teachers in the planning process for the new Regional Consortia system.
 
The letter is from April of 2014 - so it is not new - but I had not included it on this blog before and one purpose of the blog is to be a library of information which others can use in our work to save and rebuild Adult Education, especially K12 Adult Schools. 

 
 


Adult Education, like every branch of public education but even more so, is being re-formed.  It is being pruned and trimmed so that it grows in new directions.
 
Because public education is for the public and paid for by the public, we all need to be in on what is happening.   Including teachers is one way to make sure that happens.

Sabtu, 16 Agustus 2014

adult history Data and Decisions: 2011 Little Hoover Report - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Budget, Artikel Cuts and closures, Artikel Data, Artikel Facts, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Data and Decisions: 2011 Little Hoover Report - japraklupo
link : adult history Data and Decisions: 2011 Little Hoover Report - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

The following testimony was given in 2011.  I am posting it here because I think it contains important data and important conclusions.  You can agree or argue with the conclusions.  You can use the data to better understand where we've come from and decide where we should best go next.

California Department of Education,
Adult Education Testimony Little Hoover Commission 
Respectfully submitted by Dr. Patrick Ainsworth,
Director of Secondary, Career, and Adult Learning Division
and Ms. Debra Jones, Administrator, Adult Education Office June 23, 2011 

Thank you for the opportunity to address the Little Hoover Commission and to share the vital issues surrounding adult education and the impacts of the current budget reductions. Adult Education has a long history in California serving adults since 1856. The first classes were taught in the basement of Old St. Mary’s Cathedral in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants. Since that time, the program has grown, and in 2008 adult education served 1.2 million adults. 

The current fiscal crisis has impacted hundreds of thousands of adults in California. Flexibility has redirected the Adult Education budget of 634 million dollars to the kindergarten through grade twelve (K–12) system to be used for any educational purpose. School districts and school boards have had to make difficult decisions in this time of limited resources. It is estimated that half of the 2011 adult education budget was spent on adult education.  

Hit the "read more" link to get the full scoop.

I am here with Ms. Debra Jones to answer the questions you posed. We will be happy to provide more information as needed.  

What are the key functions and core mission of the state’s Adult Education programs? How do these differ from those programs offered through the community college system? How do the student populations and outcomes differ between the two systems? 

Over 5.3 million Californians lack a high school diploma. This number does not include the English as a Second Language (ESL) population that may have a diploma but does not speak English well; nor does it include the large population of adults who receive diplomas but require remedial instruction in order to be prepared for postsecondary education or careers. Half of those 5.3 million adults have educational attainment levels below the ninth grade, yet only 1.1 million adults, roughly 21 percent, are receiving these services through adult schools and community colleges each year. 

The key function and core mission of Adult Education is to provide educational services in four core areas: (1) ESL; (2) Adult Secondary Education (ASE) grade levels 9–12; (3) Adult Basic Education (ABE) grade levels 0–8; (4) and Career Technical Education (CTE). Eighty-seven percent of all Adult Education students are enrolled in these four program areas. 

Three hundred adult schools, 40 community-based organizations, 13 library literacy programs and 17 community colleges are awarded Workforce Investment Act (WIA), Title II grant awards through Adult Education. Classes are taught in over 700 sites, including schools, workplaces, public service agencies, and One-Stops. 

Although the program areas are consistent with those offered in the community college system, Adult Education serves a different student demographic. The Adult Education students tend to be older than community college students, and they have lower levels of educational attainment than community college students. Adult Education serves more female students and a higher percentage of the students are of Hispanic origin. Forty-five percent of Adult Education students lack a high school diploma and one-third are unemployed. The following table illustrates the primary and secondary goals reported by students in Adult Education for the 2009–10 year.   
                
The United States Department of Education National Reporting System sets the standards for literacy and core performance outcomes for Adult Education. Performance based outcomes include literacy gains at all levels of ESL and secondary education. The California Department of Education (CDE) is held accountable for core performance measures including job attainment, job retention, acquisition of a high school diploma, and transition to postsecondary education and training. These outcomes are annually reported to the federal government and to the governor. 

How has the recent funding flexibility affected the range of programs offered through Adult Education, particularly for those students who want to continue on to a community college? Has this policy changed the way Adult Education programs work with community colleges? 

Total Enrollment WIA, Title II 2009–10  696,831  

Primary or Secondary Goal      Primary Goal       Secondary Goal

High School Diploma                   91,192                 27,307

Get a Job                                       13,715                44,980

Retain Job                                        5,441                 23,229

Enter college or training                  3,831                27,436

Improve basic skills                      213,203               95,520

Improve English skills                 303,308                74,142

Personal Goal                                27,645               261,858

Family Goal                                     5,238                22,788

U.S. Citizenship                                6,573                 7,802

Military                                                303                 1,933

Work-based project                             462                  1,343

Other Attainable Goal                     4,390                 21,401



The following table illustrates the decrease in enrollments from 2008–09 to 2009–10. Although data is not yet available for 2010–11 it is anticipated that there will be further reductions in enrollment.

Program      2008–09      2009–10      Decrease

ESL             444,492         324,123      27%

ASE            226,053         194,156      14%

CTE            180,494          94,483       48%

ABE              76,516          68,175       11%

Citizenship      2,985            1,050       65%

Adults w/ Disabilities
                      26,839            12,146      55%

Health and Safety
                    26,911                9,466      65%

Home Economics
                  17,371                 7,475       57%

Parent Education
               67,688                  24,089       64%

Older Adults
             142,319                  41,690      71%

Total 1,212,068               776,853        36% 

Eighty-seven percent of Adult Education students are enrolled in the four core program areas of ESL, ASE, ABE, and CTE. The largest percent of students who transition from the Adult Education program to the community college come from the ASE and ESL programs.  

The impact of the budget reductions and redistribution of adult education funding resulted in cuts to most adult schools. Schools report teacher lay-offs and waiting lists for classes. The capacity to serve students is diminished for both systems by the current economic climate, and yet the need for adult education services has not diminished. The Adult Education program and the community college system recognize that coordination of services between systems is necessary to create a seamless transition for students from one program to another.  

How do the Department of Education and the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges coordinate at the state level to oversee these programs? How could the state improve coordination between these two offices to maximize the state’s investment in Adult Education? 

The CDE and California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) continue to discuss the implications of coordinating at the state level to maximize the state’s investment in Adult Education. A strategic effort by CDE and CCCCO is required to address the issues of educating California’s adults in these times of limited resources. The administration and staff of both systems have met to share information. The CDE and CCCCO have identified key areas that support the goal of creating an aligned system that efficiently and effectively meets the goals of adult students in California: 

• Professional development
• Course articulation agreements
• Curriculum and instruction that includes pathways
• Aligned readiness assessments
 • Data collection and tracking of student outcomes
• Bridge programs 

The CDE recognizes that both systems together must take a strategic and coordinated approach to addressing and resolving the issues that surround the education of adults in California. We look forward to sharing in a more collaborative environment. 

Over the course of this study the Commission has heard from a number of witnesses who have suggested the need to strengthen the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges. Would changes to the authority and function of the Chancellor’s Office improve your office’s ability to partner with the community colleges? If so, how? 

We do not presume to know what changes are necessary to the authority and function of the Chancellor’s Office to improve the CDE’s ability to partner with the community colleges. However, we have agreed with the CCCCO to continue to work together to develop a more seamless delivery system that supports student successful transition to the community colleges.  

Coordination, collaborations and partnerships between adult schools and community colleges exist across the state in isolated efforts. Some of the best practices include formalized bridge programs, articulated course sequences, aligned career pathways, co-location and aligned assessments. However, these programs are independent of each other, and have not been taken to scale. Every adult school and every community college is autonomous. Each local effort is an independent partnership.  

Currently there is no mechanism to replicate best practices. For example, students leaving Adult Education could be better prepared for admission to the community college if there was a common assessment of college readiness. As it is, each college creates its own placement assessment and that differs from the assessment a student is given at the adult school. The lack of coordination at the state level makes it difficult to affect systemic change. 

What are the benefits of maintaining adult education programs in both the Adult Education and community college systems? Are there some categories of courses that are more appropriate for one system than the other? Is there a need to further clarify this delineation of service? 

Student demographics are different in each system. Forty percent of Adult Education students do not have a high school diploma, and 50 percent enter the system to improve their English skills. Approximately 186,000 students are enrolled in the high school diploma program in Adult Education. It is estimated that 15 percent of Adult Education students are annually prepared to enter the community college system. These students perform at the high levels of ASE and ESL basic skills in the CDE system.  

The CDE has used federal dollars through the years to build a strong infrastructure in terms of accountability, technology, and professional development through its core leadership projects. Historically the Adult Education infrastructure was built on serving students needing to improve their basic skills. Adult Education serves the lowest learners...those who speak little to no English. The accountability system, the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS), technology, and professional development are keenly structured to serve those hardest to reach and to serve. 
The local adult schools have strong partnerships with K–12 districts. The ESL classes are held on school campuses and are filled with the parents of K–12 students who engage in their children’s learning while improving their own basic skills. Some programs provide literacy programs that focus on a child’s success in school. Learners whose primary goal was family-related cited increased involvement in their children’s education (21 percent) and children’s literacy (15 percent), and meeting a personal (55 percent) and family goal (48 percent). These learners also showed significant community-related outcomes. 

Another function of Adult Education is to provide remediation courses and credit recovery to high school students who are in jeopardy of graduating with their class. These programs are easily coordinated between adult schools and high schools. Annually, 75,000 high school students take a class from Adult Education. 

There is a need to align the courses and programs offered in Adult Education and at the community colleges and to create multiple access points to each system. Research shows that in states with a coordinated approach to educating adults, including clear articulated pathways and integrated course sequences, a student learns at an accelerated pace. For example, contextualized CTE and basic skill courses may be offered by two systems in the same classroom.  

Neither system has the capacity to meet the scale and diversity of need. Both systems are operating on reduced resources. The Adult Education system’s unique strengths include the physical location of hundreds of sites, the affordability of classes, the flexible enrollment strategies, the cultural competence of staff, and the recognized image of adult schools within a community as an “approachable” learning environment. 

How could the state better integrate the systems at the local level to ensure that students who take courses through Adult Education programs transition to a community college without repeating coursework? Are there some districts in California that are already doing this well? What are some of the challenges to improving articulation? 

Adult Education system has prioritized the transition of students into postsecondary education, training, and employment. The CDE collaborated with the National College Transition Network to offer a summit, training and ongoing professional development opportunities to local practitioners. The CDE recently received a technical assistance grant from the Office of Vocational and Adult Education to implement a Policy to Performance Initiative with ten local agencies. The focus of the program is to provide articulated services between the systems to promote successful transition to the community college.   

Jobs in the future will increasingly employ workers with education and training beyond the high school level. Postsecondary education can provide the skills needed for these jobs. There are examples throughout California where local programs have collaborated with the community colleges to ensure a seamless transition for students. The two examples illustrate articulated programs between adult schools and community colleges: 

• Successful transition programs were designed by local providers to support and mentor ESL students to allow them to transfer to credit community college courses or vocational certificate programs. Students enroll in a minimum of 12 units with at least three that are non-ESL courses. Each student is given a mentor who assists with enrollment and provides support. These mentors also expose the students to different opportunities for the future, such as scholarships and academic support resources 

• A local provider restructured its ABE program to focus on helping students set clear academic and professional goals, and to run a more effective and efficient transition program to accommodate budget reductions and decreased funding. The CASAS pretest scores are used as an entry requirement to take the ABE pathways class, and students are required to maintain at least a 90 percent attendance rate in the ABE pathways class. Most students are prepared to transition into a CTE program after 40–50 hours in the pathways class. 
Would there be value in consolidating some or all of the programs into a single adult education system? If so, what criteria should be considered? 

According to the indicators of need used in the CDE “Needs Assessment”, it is estimated that approximately 80 percent of the need for ABE, ASE and ESL is currently unmet. Adult Education and the community colleges need to be aligned and integrated, whether or not they are consolidated. Adult Education and the community colleges serve predominately different populations. The diversity and scale of this unmet need suggests that the systems leverage their respective strengths and core missions, particularly given budgetary constraints and related capacity issues. 
Locally, transitioning adult learners is key to keeping the commitment of adult basic education programs to the adult learners who have identified their long-term educational goal as entering postsecondary education. In 2009–10, 586,450 adult learners (75.5 percent) were in ABE, ASE, or ESL classes. Of these learners, 3.2 percent or 25,022, received either a high school diploma or general educational development certificate within the Adult Education WIA, Title II program. These learners are potential participants in postsecondary education and part of the pipeline of students ready to transition. 

There were also 5,893 adult learners with a goal of entering postsecondary education in 2009–10, with less than half achieving this goal (2,540). Zafft et al. reported in 2006, “While adults with GEDs or other nontraditional diplomas stand to benefit from postsecondary education, very few actually go on and those that do are rarely successful.”  

Finally, there is great value in coordinating and aligning services between the systems. An intended consequence of integration of the systems would be to reduce the amount and level of remediation taking place at the community college level and the California State University (CSU) system. The California State University's (CSU) assessment system found that, of first-time entering freshmen the CSUs in 2008, 47 percent still required some level of English remediation and 37.2 percent need math remediation; 27.1 percent of 2008–09 freshmen were not proficient in either English or mathematics. Estimates of the remedial need in the community colleges are higher, ranging from  70– 90 percent at some campuses. Students who are better prepared could complete degrees and certificates on a timelier and less costly basis. The Public Policy Institute of California projects that California will “under produce” college graduates and people with some level of postsecondary training to meet the growing workforce training demands. It is critical that both systems collaborate and coordinate to develop articulated pathways for all students at all literacy levels.  

The following testimony was given in 2011.  I am posting it here because I think it contains important data and important conclusions.  You can agree or argue with the conclusions.  You can use the data to better understand where we've come from and decide where we should best go next.

California Department of Education,
Adult Education Testimony Little Hoover Commission 
Respectfully submitted by Dr. Patrick Ainsworth,
Director of Secondary, Career, and Adult Learning Division
and Ms. Debra Jones, Administrator, Adult Education Office June 23, 2011 

Thank you for the opportunity to address the Little Hoover Commission and to share the vital issues surrounding adult education and the impacts of the current budget reductions. Adult Education has a long history in California serving adults since 1856. The first classes were taught in the basement of Old St. Mary’s Cathedral in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants. Since that time, the program has grown, and in 2008 adult education served 1.2 million adults. 

The current fiscal crisis has impacted hundreds of thousands of adults in California. Flexibility has redirected the Adult Education budget of 634 million dollars to the kindergarten through grade twelve (K–12) system to be used for any educational purpose. School districts and school boards have had to make difficult decisions in this time of limited resources. It is estimated that half of the 2011 adult education budget was spent on adult education.  

Hit the "read more" link to get the full scoop.

I am here with Ms. Debra Jones to answer the questions you posed. We will be happy to provide more information as needed.  

What are the key functions and core mission of the state’s Adult Education programs? How do these differ from those programs offered through the community college system? How do the student populations and outcomes differ between the two systems? 

Over 5.3 million Californians lack a high school diploma. This number does not include the English as a Second Language (ESL) population that may have a diploma but does not speak English well; nor does it include the large population of adults who receive diplomas but require remedial instruction in order to be prepared for postsecondary education or careers. Half of those 5.3 million adults have educational attainment levels below the ninth grade, yet only 1.1 million adults, roughly 21 percent, are receiving these services through adult schools and community colleges each year. 

The key function and core mission of Adult Education is to provide educational services in four core areas: (1) ESL; (2) Adult Secondary Education (ASE) grade levels 9–12; (3) Adult Basic Education (ABE) grade levels 0–8; (4) and Career Technical Education (CTE). Eighty-seven percent of all Adult Education students are enrolled in these four program areas. 

Three hundred adult schools, 40 community-based organizations, 13 library literacy programs and 17 community colleges are awarded Workforce Investment Act (WIA), Title II grant awards through Adult Education. Classes are taught in over 700 sites, including schools, workplaces, public service agencies, and One-Stops. 

Although the program areas are consistent with those offered in the community college system, Adult Education serves a different student demographic. The Adult Education students tend to be older than community college students, and they have lower levels of educational attainment than community college students. Adult Education serves more female students and a higher percentage of the students are of Hispanic origin. Forty-five percent of Adult Education students lack a high school diploma and one-third are unemployed. The following table illustrates the primary and secondary goals reported by students in Adult Education for the 2009–10 year.   
                
The United States Department of Education National Reporting System sets the standards for literacy and core performance outcomes for Adult Education. Performance based outcomes include literacy gains at all levels of ESL and secondary education. The California Department of Education (CDE) is held accountable for core performance measures including job attainment, job retention, acquisition of a high school diploma, and transition to postsecondary education and training. These outcomes are annually reported to the federal government and to the governor. 

How has the recent funding flexibility affected the range of programs offered through Adult Education, particularly for those students who want to continue on to a community college? Has this policy changed the way Adult Education programs work with community colleges? 

Total Enrollment WIA, Title II 2009–10  696,831  

Primary or Secondary Goal      Primary Goal       Secondary Goal

High School Diploma                   91,192                 27,307

Get a Job                                       13,715                44,980

Retain Job                                        5,441                 23,229

Enter college or training                  3,831                27,436

Improve basic skills                      213,203               95,520

Improve English skills                 303,308                74,142

Personal Goal                                27,645               261,858

Family Goal                                     5,238                22,788

U.S. Citizenship                                6,573                 7,802

Military                                                303                 1,933

Work-based project                             462                  1,343

Other Attainable Goal                     4,390                 21,401



The following table illustrates the decrease in enrollments from 2008–09 to 2009–10. Although data is not yet available for 2010–11 it is anticipated that there will be further reductions in enrollment.

Program      2008–09      2009–10      Decrease

ESL             444,492         324,123      27%

ASE            226,053         194,156      14%

CTE            180,494          94,483       48%

ABE              76,516          68,175       11%

Citizenship      2,985            1,050       65%

Adults w/ Disabilities
                      26,839            12,146      55%

Health and Safety
                    26,911                9,466      65%

Home Economics
                  17,371                 7,475       57%

Parent Education
               67,688                  24,089       64%

Older Adults
             142,319                  41,690      71%

Total 1,212,068               776,853        36% 

Eighty-seven percent of Adult Education students are enrolled in the four core program areas of ESL, ASE, ABE, and CTE. The largest percent of students who transition from the Adult Education program to the community college come from the ASE and ESL programs.  

The impact of the budget reductions and redistribution of adult education funding resulted in cuts to most adult schools. Schools report teacher lay-offs and waiting lists for classes. The capacity to serve students is diminished for both systems by the current economic climate, and yet the need for adult education services has not diminished. The Adult Education program and the community college system recognize that coordination of services between systems is necessary to create a seamless transition for students from one program to another.  

How do the Department of Education and the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges coordinate at the state level to oversee these programs? How could the state improve coordination between these two offices to maximize the state’s investment in Adult Education? 

The CDE and California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) continue to discuss the implications of coordinating at the state level to maximize the state’s investment in Adult Education. A strategic effort by CDE and CCCCO is required to address the issues of educating California’s adults in these times of limited resources. The administration and staff of both systems have met to share information. The CDE and CCCCO have identified key areas that support the goal of creating an aligned system that efficiently and effectively meets the goals of adult students in California: 

• Professional development
• Course articulation agreements
• Curriculum and instruction that includes pathways
• Aligned readiness assessments
 • Data collection and tracking of student outcomes
• Bridge programs 

The CDE recognizes that both systems together must take a strategic and coordinated approach to addressing and resolving the issues that surround the education of adults in California. We look forward to sharing in a more collaborative environment. 

Over the course of this study the Commission has heard from a number of witnesses who have suggested the need to strengthen the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges. Would changes to the authority and function of the Chancellor’s Office improve your office’s ability to partner with the community colleges? If so, how? 

We do not presume to know what changes are necessary to the authority and function of the Chancellor’s Office to improve the CDE’s ability to partner with the community colleges. However, we have agreed with the CCCCO to continue to work together to develop a more seamless delivery system that supports student successful transition to the community colleges.  

Coordination, collaborations and partnerships between adult schools and community colleges exist across the state in isolated efforts. Some of the best practices include formalized bridge programs, articulated course sequences, aligned career pathways, co-location and aligned assessments. However, these programs are independent of each other, and have not been taken to scale. Every adult school and every community college is autonomous. Each local effort is an independent partnership.  

Currently there is no mechanism to replicate best practices. For example, students leaving Adult Education could be better prepared for admission to the community college if there was a common assessment of college readiness. As it is, each college creates its own placement assessment and that differs from the assessment a student is given at the adult school. The lack of coordination at the state level makes it difficult to affect systemic change. 

What are the benefits of maintaining adult education programs in both the Adult Education and community college systems? Are there some categories of courses that are more appropriate for one system than the other? Is there a need to further clarify this delineation of service? 

Student demographics are different in each system. Forty percent of Adult Education students do not have a high school diploma, and 50 percent enter the system to improve their English skills. Approximately 186,000 students are enrolled in the high school diploma program in Adult Education. It is estimated that 15 percent of Adult Education students are annually prepared to enter the community college system. These students perform at the high levels of ASE and ESL basic skills in the CDE system.  

The CDE has used federal dollars through the years to build a strong infrastructure in terms of accountability, technology, and professional development through its core leadership projects. Historically the Adult Education infrastructure was built on serving students needing to improve their basic skills. Adult Education serves the lowest learners...those who speak little to no English. The accountability system, the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS), technology, and professional development are keenly structured to serve those hardest to reach and to serve. 
The local adult schools have strong partnerships with K–12 districts. The ESL classes are held on school campuses and are filled with the parents of K–12 students who engage in their children’s learning while improving their own basic skills. Some programs provide literacy programs that focus on a child’s success in school. Learners whose primary goal was family-related cited increased involvement in their children’s education (21 percent) and children’s literacy (15 percent), and meeting a personal (55 percent) and family goal (48 percent). These learners also showed significant community-related outcomes. 

Another function of Adult Education is to provide remediation courses and credit recovery to high school students who are in jeopardy of graduating with their class. These programs are easily coordinated between adult schools and high schools. Annually, 75,000 high school students take a class from Adult Education. 

There is a need to align the courses and programs offered in Adult Education and at the community colleges and to create multiple access points to each system. Research shows that in states with a coordinated approach to educating adults, including clear articulated pathways and integrated course sequences, a student learns at an accelerated pace. For example, contextualized CTE and basic skill courses may be offered by two systems in the same classroom.  

Neither system has the capacity to meet the scale and diversity of need. Both systems are operating on reduced resources. The Adult Education system’s unique strengths include the physical location of hundreds of sites, the affordability of classes, the flexible enrollment strategies, the cultural competence of staff, and the recognized image of adult schools within a community as an “approachable” learning environment. 

How could the state better integrate the systems at the local level to ensure that students who take courses through Adult Education programs transition to a community college without repeating coursework? Are there some districts in California that are already doing this well? What are some of the challenges to improving articulation? 

Adult Education system has prioritized the transition of students into postsecondary education, training, and employment. The CDE collaborated with the National College Transition Network to offer a summit, training and ongoing professional development opportunities to local practitioners. The CDE recently received a technical assistance grant from the Office of Vocational and Adult Education to implement a Policy to Performance Initiative with ten local agencies. The focus of the program is to provide articulated services between the systems to promote successful transition to the community college.   

Jobs in the future will increasingly employ workers with education and training beyond the high school level. Postsecondary education can provide the skills needed for these jobs. There are examples throughout California where local programs have collaborated with the community colleges to ensure a seamless transition for students. The two examples illustrate articulated programs between adult schools and community colleges: 

• Successful transition programs were designed by local providers to support and mentor ESL students to allow them to transfer to credit community college courses or vocational certificate programs. Students enroll in a minimum of 12 units with at least three that are non-ESL courses. Each student is given a mentor who assists with enrollment and provides support. These mentors also expose the students to different opportunities for the future, such as scholarships and academic support resources 

• A local provider restructured its ABE program to focus on helping students set clear academic and professional goals, and to run a more effective and efficient transition program to accommodate budget reductions and decreased funding. The CASAS pretest scores are used as an entry requirement to take the ABE pathways class, and students are required to maintain at least a 90 percent attendance rate in the ABE pathways class. Most students are prepared to transition into a CTE program after 40–50 hours in the pathways class. 
Would there be value in consolidating some or all of the programs into a single adult education system? If so, what criteria should be considered? 

According to the indicators of need used in the CDE “Needs Assessment”, it is estimated that approximately 80 percent of the need for ABE, ASE and ESL is currently unmet. Adult Education and the community colleges need to be aligned and integrated, whether or not they are consolidated. Adult Education and the community colleges serve predominately different populations. The diversity and scale of this unmet need suggests that the systems leverage their respective strengths and core missions, particularly given budgetary constraints and related capacity issues. 
Locally, transitioning adult learners is key to keeping the commitment of adult basic education programs to the adult learners who have identified their long-term educational goal as entering postsecondary education. In 2009–10, 586,450 adult learners (75.5 percent) were in ABE, ASE, or ESL classes. Of these learners, 3.2 percent or 25,022, received either a high school diploma or general educational development certificate within the Adult Education WIA, Title II program. These learners are potential participants in postsecondary education and part of the pipeline of students ready to transition. 

There were also 5,893 adult learners with a goal of entering postsecondary education in 2009–10, with less than half achieving this goal (2,540). Zafft et al. reported in 2006, “While adults with GEDs or other nontraditional diplomas stand to benefit from postsecondary education, very few actually go on and those that do are rarely successful.”  

Finally, there is great value in coordinating and aligning services between the systems. An intended consequence of integration of the systems would be to reduce the amount and level of remediation taking place at the community college level and the California State University (CSU) system. The California State University's (CSU) assessment system found that, of first-time entering freshmen the CSUs in 2008, 47 percent still required some level of English remediation and 37.2 percent need math remediation; 27.1 percent of 2008–09 freshmen were not proficient in either English or mathematics. Estimates of the remedial need in the community colleges are higher, ranging from  70– 90 percent at some campuses. Students who are better prepared could complete degrees and certificates on a timelier and less costly basis. The Public Policy Institute of California projects that California will “under produce” college graduates and people with some level of postsecondary training to meet the growing workforce training demands. It is critical that both systems collaborate and coordinate to develop articulated pathways for all students at all literacy levels.  

adult history CCAE Call to Action Webinar - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Budget, Artikel CCAE, Artikel Strategy, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history CCAE Call to Action Webinar - japraklupo
link : adult history CCAE Call to Action Webinar - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

CCAE - California Council of Adult Education - held a Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar on July 31.

You can listen to the Webinar in full by going to the Legislative page of the CCAE website and clicking on the blue box that says, "Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar."

Follow the instructions - you will need to download a few things - and in a few minutes you will be able to see and hear CCAE Legislative Analyst Dawn Koepke walk you through the CCAE strategy.

It's an excellent webinar and Ms. Koepke explains things very clearly.

The CCAE Legislative page also includes

2015–16 Budget Timeline
2015–16 Budget Myth vs. Fact
2015–16 Budget Sample NASCAR Letter
2015–16 Budget Talking Points
CCAE Section Legislator Responsibilities

all of which you can click on and download from this page or the CCAE website.

I highly recommend that you watch the webinar and download the CCAE documents.


Already on the AEM blog:

CCAE Legislative Talking Points

CCAE Myths & Facts

Getting to the Finish - includes the CCAE Budget Timeline


CCAE - California Council of Adult Education - held a Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar on July 31.

You can listen to the Webinar in full by going to the Legislative page of the CCAE website and clicking on the blue box that says, "Legislative Update and Call to Action Webinar."

Follow the instructions - you will need to download a few things - and in a few minutes you will be able to see and hear CCAE Legislative Analyst Dawn Koepke walk you through the CCAE strategy.

It's an excellent webinar and Ms. Koepke explains things very clearly.

The CCAE Legislative page also includes

2015–16 Budget Timeline
2015–16 Budget Myth vs. Fact
2015–16 Budget Sample NASCAR Letter
2015–16 Budget Talking Points
CCAE Section Legislator Responsibilities

all of which you can click on and download from this page or the CCAE website.

I highly recommend that you watch the webinar and download the CCAE documents.


Already on the AEM blog:

CCAE Legislative Talking Points

CCAE Myths & Facts

Getting to the Finish - includes the CCAE Budget Timeline


Rabu, 06 Agustus 2014

adult history Getting to the Finish - japraklupo

Agustus 2014 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Agustus 2014, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel A4CAS, Artikel CCAE, Artikel CFT, Artikel cosas, Artikel CTA, Artikel NLLB, Artikel Red for Adult Ed, Artikel Strategy, Artikel Unity, Artikel UTLA, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Getting to the Finish - japraklupo
link : adult history Getting to the Finish - japraklupo

Baca juga


Agustus 2014

This is it, folks.  The last leg of our marathon.

The money for K12 Adult Schools runs out in June of 2015.

We have until January - really, it needs to happen before then - to convince Governor Brown, the Department of Finance and the Legislature that K12 Adult Schools need their own secure funding source.  Yes, we have a new Regional Consortia system.  But without secure funding, the future is mightily uncertain for K12 Adult Schools.

Everyone who cares about Adult Ed and K12 Adult Schools - grassroots groups, CCAE, CFT, CTA, UTLA, etc. - is going to be doing all they can - calling, visiting, and emailing the Gov, DOF, and Legislators, pulling together NASCAR letters, connecting with community and communicating in creative ways the message:

Adult Education matters!

K12 Adult Schools need their own secure funding!

And for many of us:  Keep the mission of Adult Ed broad! 

Strategies may differ slightly but the end goal is the same: 

A good future for our people
         through good public Adult Education.


Here's a budget timeline kindly provided by CCAE:


Fiscal Year 15-16 Budget Timeline


July 1, 2014 Fiscal Year 14-15 Budget Takes Effect

July – December 2014 Development of the Governor’s FY 15-16 Budget Proposal

State & Local-Based Adult Education Advocacy

Public Relations Campaign

October 1, 2014 Deadline for Local Meetings & Nascar Letters to be Submitted

November 4, 2014 General Election

December 1, 2014 Beginning of 2015-16 Legislative Session

January 5, 2015 Legislature Reconvenes for 2015-16 Legislative Session

January 10, 2015 Release of the Governor’s FY 15-16 Budget Plan

(within a couple days or so)

January – May 2015 Budget Subcommittee Hearings & Decision-Making

March 15, 2015 School District Lay Off Notice Deadline

March 24, 2015 CCAE & CAEAA Leg Day at the Capitol

**Budget Advocacy & Focus – Be There, Strength in Numbers!

June 15, 2015 Constitutional Legislative Budget Deadline

July 1, 2015 FY 15-16 Budget Takes Effect
 




Here are some of the strategies for getting us to our goal:

*  A4CAS's - Alliance for California Adult School's - strategy

CCAE's  (California Council of Adult Education) - strategy

CFT's (California Federation of Teachers Union) strategy

CTA's (California Teacher Association) strategy

NLLB's (No Lawmaker Left Behind) strategy (part of A4CAS)

UTLA's (United Teachers of Los Angeles) strategy

Full disclosure:   I work with A4CAS (Alliance for California Adult School).  I am on the steering committee for NLLB (No Lawmaker Left Behind).    I am a member of CFT (California Federation of Teachers union) and CCAE (California Council of Adult Education).   And I work at San Mateo Adult School.


If you look closely you will see while the approaches may differ in style and scope they all have the following things in common:

* Connect with the Governor and Legislature
* Get the message out that Adult Education matters
* Stories and data - heart and mind - both are important
* K12 Adult Schools need their own wallet


SMAS Student Leader Hitomi getting the message out:
K12 Adult Schools need secure funding!

My personal thoughts and observations:

* Wearing Red for Adult Ed on Tuesdays - unifies & amplifies
* Being organized in multiple ways - hard but helpful
* Sharing data so that all can access and use for good - multiplies the good
* Connecting with community, press, legislature - turns the tide
* Respecting different approaches - sustains
* Staying out of blame and accusation - rejuvenates
* Staying in support and respect - strengthens
* Understanding we share the goal of saving and strengthening public Adult Education because we share the larger goal of wanting a good future for our people - empowers

* And when you're tired and worn out, consider these guys:


AP Photo/Elise Amendola
Jeff Glasbrenner, Andre Slay and Chris Madison cross the finish line of the Boston Marathon 2014.
Glasbrenner ran Boston in 2013 but didn't get to finish because of the bombings.

We can do this. 
 
Yes, together, we most definitely can.

This is it, folks.  The last leg of our marathon.

The money for K12 Adult Schools runs out in June of 2015.

We have until January - really, it needs to happen before then - to convince Governor Brown, the Department of Finance and the Legislature that K12 Adult Schools need their own secure funding source.  Yes, we have a new Regional Consortia system.  But without secure funding, the future is mightily uncertain for K12 Adult Schools.

Everyone who cares about Adult Ed and K12 Adult Schools - grassroots groups, CCAE, CFT, CTA, UTLA, etc. - is going to be doing all they can - calling, visiting, and emailing the Gov, DOF, and Legislators, pulling together NASCAR letters, connecting with community and communicating in creative ways the message:

Adult Education matters!

K12 Adult Schools need their own secure funding!

And for many of us:  Keep the mission of Adult Ed broad! 

Strategies may differ slightly but the end goal is the same: 

A good future for our people
         through good public Adult Education.


Here's a budget timeline kindly provided by CCAE:


Fiscal Year 15-16 Budget Timeline


July 1, 2014 Fiscal Year 14-15 Budget Takes Effect

July – December 2014 Development of the Governor’s FY 15-16 Budget Proposal

State & Local-Based Adult Education Advocacy

Public Relations Campaign

October 1, 2014 Deadline for Local Meetings & Nascar Letters to be Submitted

November 4, 2014 General Election

December 1, 2014 Beginning of 2015-16 Legislative Session

January 5, 2015 Legislature Reconvenes for 2015-16 Legislative Session

January 10, 2015 Release of the Governor’s FY 15-16 Budget Plan

(within a couple days or so)

January – May 2015 Budget Subcommittee Hearings & Decision-Making

March 15, 2015 School District Lay Off Notice Deadline

March 24, 2015 CCAE & CAEAA Leg Day at the Capitol

**Budget Advocacy & Focus – Be There, Strength in Numbers!

June 15, 2015 Constitutional Legislative Budget Deadline

July 1, 2015 FY 15-16 Budget Takes Effect
 




Here are some of the strategies for getting us to our goal:

*  A4CAS's - Alliance for California Adult School's - strategy

CCAE's  (California Council of Adult Education) - strategy

CFT's (California Federation of Teachers Union) strategy

CTA's (California Teacher Association) strategy

NLLB's (No Lawmaker Left Behind) strategy (part of A4CAS)

UTLA's (United Teachers of Los Angeles) strategy

Full disclosure:   I work with A4CAS (Alliance for California Adult School).  I am on the steering committee for NLLB (No Lawmaker Left Behind).    I am a member of CFT (California Federation of Teachers union) and CCAE (California Council of Adult Education).   And I work at San Mateo Adult School.


If you look closely you will see while the approaches may differ in style and scope they all have the following things in common:

* Connect with the Governor and Legislature
* Get the message out that Adult Education matters
* Stories and data - heart and mind - both are important
* K12 Adult Schools need their own wallet



SMAS Student Leader Hitomi getting the message out:
K12 Adult Schools need secure funding!

My personal thoughts and observations:

* Wearing Red for Adult Ed on Tuesdays - unifies & amplifies
* Being organized in multiple ways - hard but helpful
* Sharing data so that all can access and use for good - multiplies the good
* Connecting with community, press, legislature - turns the tide
* Respecting different approaches - sustains
* Staying out of blame and accusation - rejuvenates
* Staying in support and respect - strengthens
* Understanding we share the goal of saving and strengthening public Adult Education because we share the larger goal of wanting a good future for our people - empowers

* And when you're tired and worn out, consider these guys:


AP Photo/Elise Amendola
Jeff Glasbrenner, Andre Slay and Chris Madison cross the finish line of the Boston Marathon 2014.
Glasbrenner ran Boston in 2013 but didn't get to finish because of the bombings.

We can do this. 
 
Yes, together, we most definitely can.