Senin, 28 Maret 2016

adult history "Why California's Adult Schools Need More Money" - from Save Your Adult School - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Adult Education Task Force, Artikel Affirming Adult Ed, Artikel Bills in Process, Artikel Budget, Artikel Perspective, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history "Why California's Adult Schools Need More Money" - from Save Your Adult School - japraklupo
link : adult history "Why California's Adult Schools Need More Money" - from Save Your Adult School - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

With permission from Kristen Pursley:

Why California’s Adult Schools Need More Money

While California’s economy  rebounds, and educational institutions from K-12 schools to universities receive healthy increases in funding, California’s adult schools remain mired in the great recession.  A new bill authored by Assemblywoman Patty Lopez (D-San Fernando), AB 1846, seeks to remedy this situation. AB 1846 would increase the Adult Education Block Grant (AEBG)  by $250 million, returning the amount of funding available to adult schools to roughly  pre-recession levels.  AB 1846 would provide sorely-needed relief to adult schools, which have been woefully underfunded for the last eight years. In addition to hampering the ability of adult schools to provide much needed services to their students, the current inadequate level of funding also locks into place inequalities that are the result of a desperate scramble for survival. As is usually the case in such struggles, the neediest were the losers, while those with more resources fared better. Without better funding, California’s adult schools cannot hope to fulfill their new mandate to serve those most in need, fill gaps in service, and help adults overcome barriers that keep them from accessing educational services.

Hit the link to read more.


In 2008, in response to the state budget crisis, the state dissolved the categorical status of adult schools and allowed school districts to use adult school money for any educational purpose (Categorical Flexibility). As a result, funding for adult schools went into a free fall. Between 2008 and 2013,  funding for California’s adult schools was slashed by almost half. Some communities lost their adult schools altogether during this time, while almost every adult school had to drastically cut back its services. The number of adult schools dropped from 620 to 554, a decrease of 11%, and adult schools experienced a 36% drop in enrollment.  (Source: testimony of Natasha Collins, Fiscal and Policy Analyst for the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, at a March 11, 2015 joint hearing of the Assembly Education, Assembly Higher Education and Senate Education Committees.)

For adult schools, the period from 2008 to 2013 was chaotic.  There were practically no rules; most of the laws governing adult schools had been suspended. The survival or demise of adult schools was almost serendipitous. It depended on how badly the school district needed the adult school’s resources, how well the adult school administration got along with the school district, and so on. A change in the school board or a new superintendent could mean the difference between life or death for an adult school. The entire budget of an adult school could be wiped out to fund a superintendent’s pet project. This was the opposite of a carefully planned reallocation of resources to serve those most in need. It was a free for all.

In 2013 the state finally provided some financial stability for adult schools, but just barely. Since 2013, adult school funding has been locked in at about half of what it was before the great recession of 2008: about $350 million, down from $750 million in 2007-2008.  This year, the new Adult Education Block Grant (AEBG)  provides some dedicated state funding for adult schools for the first time since 2008.  However, the amount of the grant that is guaranteed to go to adult schools is the same inadequate $350 million adult schools have been receiving in the form of a Maintenance of Effort since 2013.  This is only enough for adult schools to continue providing services at the much-reduced levels of 2012-2013. It certainly is not enough to restore services or address the inequalities that were exacerbated by the completely unregulated Categorical Flexibility period from 2008 to 2013. The insufficient level of funding guarantees that the recovery of California’s adult schools will be slow and painful, if it happens at all.

The truly ragged and threadbare state of adult school funding is partially concealed by the dedication of adult school teachers. In the district where I teach, there are whole programs where every teacher works as a volunteer through the summer so that services to students will not be interrupted.  Teachers buy their own supplies and otherwise take on the burden of making sure their students are served.  Without their quiet and unrecognized efforts, the sorry state of adult schools in California would be even more starkly apparent.

The full amount of the Adult Education Block Grant is $500 million; $350 million goes directly to school districts to fund adult schools, the remaining $1.5 million is distributed to the new consortia, which include adult schools and community colleges.  The consortia decide how to spend their portion of the $1.5 million. According to testimony from one of the consortia at a recent California Senate Budget  Subcommittee hearing, some consortia are using their portion of the AEBG to bring back their adult schools, even reopening an adult school that closed. These are hopeful signs, but the consortia can only do so much with funding that does not even equal pre-2008 levels. You can view the hearing here: http://vod.senate.ca.gov/videos/2016/20160310_BudgetSub1_high.mp4

AB 1846 would greatly improve this situation; a $250 million increase to the AEBG would restore the funding available to  adult schools  to $750 million, which is about the amount the state spent on its adult schools in 2007-2008.  This would allow for some real restoration of adult school services.  All  branches of education  except adult schools were given a substantial funding increase in this year’s state budget.  How can the state justify keeping adult schools, who suffered more than any other branch of education during the recession years, in a state of perpetual want? With six million Californians in need of the basic literacy services adult schools provide, and only 1.5 million served by community colleges and adult schools together, there can be no justification for starving adult schools and leaving their students without services.

Apparently there are some legislators who say they want to see how the consortia are working out before increasing the AEBG.  But the consortia are a collaboration between adult schools and community colleges.  The community colleges have been getting a substantial increase in funding in every state budget over the past several years. It isn’t fair to hold adult schools alone accountable for the success of the consortia.  A system where only one party is held accountable is not a collaboration; it’s a system of subjugation.  The legislature could send a clear message that adult schools and community colleges are equal partners in the consortia by increasing the funding available to adult schools and releasing them from the harsh conditions of austerity they have been forced to endure for the course of eight years.

Legislators have certainly had plenty of time to observe how adult schools function with inadequate funding; eight years should be more than enough.  In case they are still having trouble seeing it, the answer is, we’re doing the best we can, but not as well as we could do with adequate support.  We are determined. We are dedicated.  We will never abandon our students.  But we would like to be able to turn our determination and dedication away from the sheer struggle to survive day to day and towards giving our students  what they need to thrive.  AB 1846 , if it passes, could give us what we need to do that.




With permission from Kristen Pursley:

Why California’s Adult Schools Need More Money

While California’s economy  rebounds, and educational institutions from K-12 schools to universities receive healthy increases in funding, California’s adult schools remain mired in the great recession.  A new bill authored by Assemblywoman Patty Lopez (D-San Fernando), AB 1846, seeks to remedy this situation. AB 1846 would increase the Adult Education Block Grant (AEBG)  by $250 million, returning the amount of funding available to adult schools to roughly  pre-recession levels.  AB 1846 would provide sorely-needed relief to adult schools, which have been woefully underfunded for the last eight years. In addition to hampering the ability of adult schools to provide much needed services to their students, the current inadequate level of funding also locks into place inequalities that are the result of a desperate scramble for survival. As is usually the case in such struggles, the neediest were the losers, while those with more resources fared better. Without better funding, California’s adult schools cannot hope to fulfill their new mandate to serve those most in need, fill gaps in service, and help adults overcome barriers that keep them from accessing educational services.

Hit the link to read more.


In 2008, in response to the state budget crisis, the state dissolved the categorical status of adult schools and allowed school districts to use adult school money for any educational purpose (Categorical Flexibility). As a result, funding for adult schools went into a free fall. Between 2008 and 2013,  funding for California’s adult schools was slashed by almost half. Some communities lost their adult schools altogether during this time, while almost every adult school had to drastically cut back its services. The number of adult schools dropped from 620 to 554, a decrease of 11%, and adult schools experienced a 36% drop in enrollment.  (Source: testimony of Natasha Collins, Fiscal and Policy Analyst for the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, at a March 11, 2015 joint hearing of the Assembly Education, Assembly Higher Education and Senate Education Committees.)

For adult schools, the period from 2008 to 2013 was chaotic.  There were practically no rules; most of the laws governing adult schools had been suspended. The survival or demise of adult schools was almost serendipitous. It depended on how badly the school district needed the adult school’s resources, how well the adult school administration got along with the school district, and so on. A change in the school board or a new superintendent could mean the difference between life or death for an adult school. The entire budget of an adult school could be wiped out to fund a superintendent’s pet project. This was the opposite of a carefully planned reallocation of resources to serve those most in need. It was a free for all.

In 2013 the state finally provided some financial stability for adult schools, but just barely. Since 2013, adult school funding has been locked in at about half of what it was before the great recession of 2008: about $350 million, down from $750 million in 2007-2008.  This year, the new Adult Education Block Grant (AEBG)  provides some dedicated state funding for adult schools for the first time since 2008.  However, the amount of the grant that is guaranteed to go to adult schools is the same inadequate $350 million adult schools have been receiving in the form of a Maintenance of Effort since 2013.  This is only enough for adult schools to continue providing services at the much-reduced levels of 2012-2013. It certainly is not enough to restore services or address the inequalities that were exacerbated by the completely unregulated Categorical Flexibility period from 2008 to 2013. The insufficient level of funding guarantees that the recovery of California’s adult schools will be slow and painful, if it happens at all.

The truly ragged and threadbare state of adult school funding is partially concealed by the dedication of adult school teachers. In the district where I teach, there are whole programs where every teacher works as a volunteer through the summer so that services to students will not be interrupted.  Teachers buy their own supplies and otherwise take on the burden of making sure their students are served.  Without their quiet and unrecognized efforts, the sorry state of adult schools in California would be even more starkly apparent.

The full amount of the Adult Education Block Grant is $500 million; $350 million goes directly to school districts to fund adult schools, the remaining $1.5 million is distributed to the new consortia, which include adult schools and community colleges.  The consortia decide how to spend their portion of the $1.5 million. According to testimony from one of the consortia at a recent California Senate Budget  Subcommittee hearing, some consortia are using their portion of the AEBG to bring back their adult schools, even reopening an adult school that closed. These are hopeful signs, but the consortia can only do so much with funding that does not even equal pre-2008 levels. You can view the hearing here: http://vod.senate.ca.gov/videos/2016/20160310_BudgetSub1_high.mp4

AB 1846 would greatly improve this situation; a $250 million increase to the AEBG would restore the funding available to  adult schools  to $750 million, which is about the amount the state spent on its adult schools in 2007-2008.  This would allow for some real restoration of adult school services.  All  branches of education  except adult schools were given a substantial funding increase in this year’s state budget.  How can the state justify keeping adult schools, who suffered more than any other branch of education during the recession years, in a state of perpetual want? With six million Californians in need of the basic literacy services adult schools provide, and only 1.5 million served by community colleges and adult schools together, there can be no justification for starving adult schools and leaving their students without services.

Apparently there are some legislators who say they want to see how the consortia are working out before increasing the AEBG.  But the consortia are a collaboration between adult schools and community colleges.  The community colleges have been getting a substantial increase in funding in every state budget over the past several years. It isn’t fair to hold adult schools alone accountable for the success of the consortia.  A system where only one party is held accountable is not a collaboration; it’s a system of subjugation.  The legislature could send a clear message that adult schools and community colleges are equal partners in the consortia by increasing the funding available to adult schools and releasing them from the harsh conditions of austerity they have been forced to endure for the course of eight years.

Legislators have certainly had plenty of time to observe how adult schools function with inadequate funding; eight years should be more than enough.  In case they are still having trouble seeing it, the answer is, we’re doing the best we can, but not as well as we could do with adequate support.  We are determined. We are dedicated.  We will never abandon our students.  But we would like to be able to turn our determination and dedication away from the sheer struggle to survive day to day and towards giving our students  what they need to thrive.  AB 1846 , if it passes, could give us what we need to do that.




Selasa, 22 Maret 2016

adult history Spread the Message that Adult Education Matters - Suggest an AEM Stamp to the US Postal Service - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Action Step, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Spread the Message that Adult Education Matters - Suggest an AEM Stamp to the US Postal Service - japraklupo
link : adult history Spread the Message that Adult Education Matters - Suggest an AEM Stamp to the US Postal Service - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

We all know Adult Education matters.

And we all know that stamps are a way our culture recognizes the importance of something and promotes it - in one easy rectangle.

And we all know how great it would be to have Adult Education Matters stamps.

But did we all know that that is actually possible?

Here's how we do it:  

Hit the link to learn more.


The stamp selection process

The Postal Service welcomes written suggestions for stamp subjects that help portray the diversity of the American experience for a worldwide audience. Any proposal that meets established guidelines will be considered. If you are interested in submitting an idea, you should:
  1. Carefully consider the guidelines for appropriate stamp subjects (see What are the criteria for stamp subjects?)
  2. Mail your suggestion to the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee at the address below. (No in person appeals are accepted.) Due to the time required for research and approval, ideas for stamp subjects should be received at least three years prior to proposed issuance. Each submission should include pertinent historical information and important dates associated with the subject.
Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee
475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, Room 3300
Washington, DC 20260-3501
Once the suggestion is received, the following occurs:
  1. Stamp Development (the office within the Postal Service that manages the stamp design process and coordinates with CSAC) sends an acknowledgement that the proposal was received.
  2. Stamp Development evaluates and researches the submission as necessary to ensure that the proposed subject meets the criteria.
  3. The subject is placed before CSAC, and the committee takes one of two actions:
    1. it does not recommend the subject , or
    2. it holds the subject for future consideration
  4. Working in advance, CSAC submits recommendations to the Postmaster General.
  5. The Postmaster General ultimately approves the subjects and designs for all U.S. postage stamps and postal stationery. (Unfortunately, due to the length and complexity of the process, the Postal Service cannot notify the proponent if a subject is chosen.)
  6. No credit or compensation is given for the submission of a stamp subject that is selected.
Points to include in our communication:

* The value of Adult Education

* The history - over 150 years old

* The programs - Literacy, Adult Basic Education, GED, High School Diploma, ESL, Citizenship, Job Skills, Parent Education, Older Adult Programs, Financial Literacy

* Organizations which support Adult Education:  National Coalition for Literacy, California Council for Adult Education, California Federation of Teachers

* Elected Officials on record as supporters of Adult Education:  California Assembly Member Patty Lopez, Congressman Ted Lieu, California State Senator Carol Liu, California Assembly Member Rocky Chavez

We all know Adult Education matters.

And we all know that stamps are a way our culture recognizes the importance of something and promotes it - in one easy rectangle.

And we all know how great it would be to have Adult Education Matters stamps.

But did we all know that that is actually possible?

Here's how we do it:  

Hit the link to learn more.


The stamp selection process

The Postal Service welcomes written suggestions for stamp subjects that help portray the diversity of the American experience for a worldwide audience. Any proposal that meets established guidelines will be considered. If you are interested in submitting an idea, you should:
  1. Carefully consider the guidelines for appropriate stamp subjects (see What are the criteria for stamp subjects?)
  2. Mail your suggestion to the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee at the address below. (No in person appeals are accepted.) Due to the time required for research and approval, ideas for stamp subjects should be received at least three years prior to proposed issuance. Each submission should include pertinent historical information and important dates associated with the subject.
Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee
475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, Room 3300
Washington, DC 20260-3501
Once the suggestion is received, the following occurs:
  1. Stamp Development (the office within the Postal Service that manages the stamp design process and coordinates with CSAC) sends an acknowledgement that the proposal was received.
  2. Stamp Development evaluates and researches the submission as necessary to ensure that the proposed subject meets the criteria.
  3. The subject is placed before CSAC, and the committee takes one of two actions:
    1. it does not recommend the subject , or
    2. it holds the subject for future consideration
  4. Working in advance, CSAC submits recommendations to the Postmaster General.
  5. The Postmaster General ultimately approves the subjects and designs for all U.S. postage stamps and postal stationery. (Unfortunately, due to the length and complexity of the process, the Postal Service cannot notify the proponent if a subject is chosen.)
  6. No credit or compensation is given for the submission of a stamp subject that is selected.
Points to include in our communication:

* The value of Adult Education

* The history - over 150 years old

* The programs - Literacy, Adult Basic Education, GED, High School Diploma, ESL, Citizenship, Job Skills, Parent Education, Older Adult Programs, Financial Literacy

* Organizations which support Adult Education:  National Coalition for Literacy, California Council for Adult Education, California Federation of Teachers

* Elected Officials on record as supporters of Adult Education:  California Assembly Member Patty Lopez, Congressman Ted Lieu, California State Senator Carol Liu, California Assembly Member Rocky Chavez

Rabu, 16 Maret 2016

adult history From CCAE: Prepare for CCAE Leg Day - April 5, 2016 - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history From CCAE: Prepare for CCAE Leg Day - April 5, 2016 - japraklupo
link : adult history From CCAE: Prepare for CCAE Leg Day - April 5, 2016 - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

From CCAE - California Council for Adult Education - Advice for CCAE Leg Day 2016:

As we've worked to reframe and restructure adult education over the last few years, we've consistently noted the importance that the new, revised structure and distribution of resources under what is now deemed the "Adult Education Block Grant" (AEBG) be simple, clear, efficient and protected.

Hit the link to learn more.

Of greatest importance to help ease the transition this year to the AB 86 / AEBG regional consortia approach, the FY 15-16 budget provided dedicated funding directly to K-12 school districts in the amount of the districts' maintenance of effort for adult education to sustain current capacity.  This component was critically important and one of the key items we advocated heavily for to preserve current capacity now and in the future.  Further, AEBG allows for each region to decide whether its adult school members receive their funding directly from the CDE or from a fiscal agent. We believe this flexibility must be maintained and would argue the distribution of funds, particularly for the K-12 adult schools, be disseminated through their existing respective state fiscal infrastructures (CDE and the CCCO) to avoid disruption, confusion, delays, and denigration of either part of the dual delivery system.
Under the AEBG, the Block Grant Funding is provided to the CCCCO as the state-level fiscal agent with the option of entering into an interagency agreement with the CDE to distribute funds. As outlined for the distribution of MOE funds to K12 Districts in 2015-2016, the CCCCO would provide the K-12 allocation to CDE who will in turn distribute the K-12 dollars to K-12 districts/adult schools based on their regional consortia plans. The CCCCO will distribute allocations to local community college districts, based on regional consortia plans.
Sending the resources for the entire adult education system through a single funding stream has been and is likely to continue to be problematic for K-12 adult schools for a host of reasons, including:
  • Distribution of resources through a fiscal agent at the local level will run the risk of distancing adult education programs from K-12 districts. Regional plans build upon the unique identity of K-12 adult schools and so it is imperative that they continued to be tied to CDE and their individual school districts. This connection is critically important in terms of access for the students the K-12 system serves; the learning mechanisms associated with basic skills needs that builds upon the K-12 model of teaching to ensure proper uptake of the education that is more closely aligned to K-12 curriculum; staffing issues related to contracts, oversight, development, etc.; accreditation; federal oversight and matching; and more. Should the direct fiscal connection be lost to CDE and the individual school districts, K-12 adult schools could be in serious danger of losing their identity and the undeniable benefit to the students we serve could be destroyed as school districts move away from support of adult schools, thereby disconnecting the access so many of our students rely upon.
  • Distribution of resources through a regional fiscal agent in either system, - K-12 adult school or CCC - as predicted, has proven problematic as the governing boards in either system must approve the allocation and associated programmatic components of the consortium partners plan to disseminate the resources. This is inappropriate and violates the separation of powers between the two systems. Further, there are multiple examples of failure of a regional CCC fiscal agent to disseminate the planning grant funds to its school district partners. This is illustrative of the contracting and governing complexities that can be incredibly detrimental, particularly for K-12 adult schools going forward.
  • It has taken considerable time to establish fiscal infrastructure to allocate resources resulting in K-12 adult schools not receiving a timely allocation of funding. Many K-12 districts may be unwilling to float the allocation each school year until such time that the fiscal infrastructure is working.
  • Additionally, any delay in receiving a K-12 adult schools funding could result in the school districts feeling the need and/or pressure to issue March 15th layoff notices and close infrastructure.
  • Distancing K-12 adult schools fiscally from their district could also present challenges for necessary infrastructure, as some districts may choose to disallow use of district infrastructure or increase costs by charging fees/rent to utilize facilities.
  • CDE is currently charged with administering the WIA/WIOA and other federal funding associated with adult education. Much of these resources are dependent upon maintenance of effort by the state such that the federal dollars supplement an existing program rather than fund it alone. Leveraging of such federal funding requires reporting on the state interest and outcomes, particularly in the K-12 adult schools. Separating the K-12 adult school funding from CDE as it relates to federal funds could present a challenge for CDE's reporting requirements.
To be clear, the statute under Education code Section 84909(e) continues the Governor's principle of subsidiarity, providing flexibility for regions to decide whether allocation of funds via a fiscal agent or direct funding to members makes the most sense for that particular region. Further, the statute does not preclude consortia from altering course in any given year on this point allowing regions to opt to have a fiscal agent one year and direct funding the next. While we do not condone or wish to promote changes each year on this point, it is important for consortia members to understand that they can change the structure if they feel it is important to their members or district.
Also of note, for those regions that opt to have a fiscal agent, the fiscal agent should be merely serving as the bank and does not have the authority to approve or deny allocations to members following consortium approval of the allocation process and distribution. It should be clear that these funds should be passed through and neither governing boards nor school district boards have the authority to insert themselves in the allocation decisions. Further, distribution of funds should be made on an allocation basis, not on a reimbursement basis.
With regard to reporting requirements associated with the receipt of AEBG funds, it should be made clear that each member that receives funding from the AEBG bears responsibility for reporting its allocation, use of funds, outcomes, and etc. whether or not a fiscal agent is established for a consortium. More specifically, whether or not a consortium chooses a fiscal agent or direct funding members must individually track their own expenditures in their own accounting systems and report either to the consortium or state. In this regard, the only difference relative to reporting requirements for those consortia that have a fiscal agent is that the fiscal agent certifies the reporting information. For those consortia that opt to have direct funding, that member serves as their own fiscal agent and follows their own district policies and procedures. In this case, the only reporting difference is that members must certify the information they report themselves and report it directly to CDE or the CCCCO. The reporting requirements for all intents and purposes are the same.
Approaching the Capitol, Leg Day 2014
Photo Credit:  Hitomi

From CCAE - California Council for Adult Education - Advice for CCAE Leg Day 2016:

As we've worked to reframe and restructure adult education over the last few years, we've consistently noted the importance that the new, revised structure and distribution of resources under what is now deemed the "Adult Education Block Grant" (AEBG) be simple, clear, efficient and protected.

Hit the link to learn more.

Of greatest importance to help ease the transition this year to the AB 86 / AEBG regional consortia approach, the FY 15-16 budget provided dedicated funding directly to K-12 school districts in the amount of the districts' maintenance of effort for adult education to sustain current capacity.  This component was critically important and one of the key items we advocated heavily for to preserve current capacity now and in the future.  Further, AEBG allows for each region to decide whether its adult school members receive their funding directly from the CDE or from a fiscal agent. We believe this flexibility must be maintained and would argue the distribution of funds, particularly for the K-12 adult schools, be disseminated through their existing respective state fiscal infrastructures (CDE and the CCCO) to avoid disruption, confusion, delays, and denigration of either part of the dual delivery system.
Under the AEBG, the Block Grant Funding is provided to the CCCCO as the state-level fiscal agent with the option of entering into an interagency agreement with the CDE to distribute funds. As outlined for the distribution of MOE funds to K12 Districts in 2015-2016, the CCCCO would provide the K-12 allocation to CDE who will in turn distribute the K-12 dollars to K-12 districts/adult schools based on their regional consortia plans. The CCCCO will distribute allocations to local community college districts, based on regional consortia plans.
Sending the resources for the entire adult education system through a single funding stream has been and is likely to continue to be problematic for K-12 adult schools for a host of reasons, including:
  • Distribution of resources through a fiscal agent at the local level will run the risk of distancing adult education programs from K-12 districts. Regional plans build upon the unique identity of K-12 adult schools and so it is imperative that they continued to be tied to CDE and their individual school districts. This connection is critically important in terms of access for the students the K-12 system serves; the learning mechanisms associated with basic skills needs that builds upon the K-12 model of teaching to ensure proper uptake of the education that is more closely aligned to K-12 curriculum; staffing issues related to contracts, oversight, development, etc.; accreditation; federal oversight and matching; and more. Should the direct fiscal connection be lost to CDE and the individual school districts, K-12 adult schools could be in serious danger of losing their identity and the undeniable benefit to the students we serve could be destroyed as school districts move away from support of adult schools, thereby disconnecting the access so many of our students rely upon.
  • Distribution of resources through a regional fiscal agent in either system, - K-12 adult school or CCC - as predicted, has proven problematic as the governing boards in either system must approve the allocation and associated programmatic components of the consortium partners plan to disseminate the resources. This is inappropriate and violates the separation of powers between the two systems. Further, there are multiple examples of failure of a regional CCC fiscal agent to disseminate the planning grant funds to its school district partners. This is illustrative of the contracting and governing complexities that can be incredibly detrimental, particularly for K-12 adult schools going forward.
  • It has taken considerable time to establish fiscal infrastructure to allocate resources resulting in K-12 adult schools not receiving a timely allocation of funding. Many K-12 districts may be unwilling to float the allocation each school year until such time that the fiscal infrastructure is working.
  • Additionally, any delay in receiving a K-12 adult schools funding could result in the school districts feeling the need and/or pressure to issue March 15th layoff notices and close infrastructure.
  • Distancing K-12 adult schools fiscally from their district could also present challenges for necessary infrastructure, as some districts may choose to disallow use of district infrastructure or increase costs by charging fees/rent to utilize facilities.
  • CDE is currently charged with administering the WIA/WIOA and other federal funding associated with adult education. Much of these resources are dependent upon maintenance of effort by the state such that the federal dollars supplement an existing program rather than fund it alone. Leveraging of such federal funding requires reporting on the state interest and outcomes, particularly in the K-12 adult schools. Separating the K-12 adult school funding from CDE as it relates to federal funds could present a challenge for CDE's reporting requirements.
To be clear, the statute under Education code Section 84909(e) continues the Governor's principle of subsidiarity, providing flexibility for regions to decide whether allocation of funds via a fiscal agent or direct funding to members makes the most sense for that particular region. Further, the statute does not preclude consortia from altering course in any given year on this point allowing regions to opt to have a fiscal agent one year and direct funding the next. While we do not condone or wish to promote changes each year on this point, it is important for consortia members to understand that they can change the structure if they feel it is important to their members or district.
Also of note, for those regions that opt to have a fiscal agent, the fiscal agent should be merely serving as the bank and does not have the authority to approve or deny allocations to members following consortium approval of the allocation process and distribution. It should be clear that these funds should be passed through and neither governing boards nor school district boards have the authority to insert themselves in the allocation decisions. Further, distribution of funds should be made on an allocation basis, not on a reimbursement basis.
With regard to reporting requirements associated with the receipt of AEBG funds, it should be made clear that each member that receives funding from the AEBG bears responsibility for reporting its allocation, use of funds, outcomes, and etc. whether or not a fiscal agent is established for a consortium. More specifically, whether or not a consortium chooses a fiscal agent or direct funding members must individually track their own expenditures in their own accounting systems and report either to the consortium or state. In this regard, the only difference relative to reporting requirements for those consortia that have a fiscal agent is that the fiscal agent certifies the reporting information. For those consortia that opt to have direct funding, that member serves as their own fiscal agent and follows their own district policies and procedures. In this case, the only reporting difference is that members must certify the information they report themselves and report it directly to CDE or the CCCCO. The reporting requirements for all intents and purposes are the same.
Approaching the Capitol, Leg Day 2014
Photo Credit:  Hitomi

Senin, 14 Maret 2016

adult history Perspective: Funding Adult Education Is a Perceptual - Not an Economic - Problem - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Budget, Artikel Perspective, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Perspective: Funding Adult Education Is a Perceptual - Not an Economic - Problem - japraklupo
link : adult history Perspective: Funding Adult Education Is a Perceptual - Not an Economic - Problem - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

This is a perspective piece by myself, Cynthia Eagleton.  I am the facilitator of this blog and I try to provide information and inspiration to renew and rebuild Adult Education.  From time to time, I share my own perspectives as well as the perspectives of others.

In this particular perspective piece, I weave a lot of threads into a tapestry that may or may not make sense to you.  Some threads may seem obvious and true to you and others may seen invisible or wrong.  Like everyone, I have blind spots which I cannot see and vantages from I view things and these affect how I perceive things and what I think of them.  Bottom line, read at risk of disagreement or dismay.  Then again, you might agree in whole or part.  Either way, I hope it will stimulate you to consider your own perspective, your own blind spots, and how important it is for all of us to describe the part of the problem each of us can see, so that together, we can identify the animal in the center of the classroom.



I came up with the phrase "Adult Education Matters" as a means to address a perceptual problem.  At about the same time, in the way the cultural zeitgeist works, someone else came up with the phrase, "Black Lives Matter" to address a different but not unrelated perceptual problem.

It would be some time before I heard the phrase, "Black Lives Matter," but when I did, I instantly understood it's value and why it was quickly taken up by the movement. 

Both the Black Lives Matter movement and the movement to restore Adult Education in California are rooted in efforts to shift how we see things, to reframe what and who has been perceived as a "problem," to assert the value of people often pathologized, feared, denied, marginalized, and painted as a "drain" on resources, rather than as mighty and precious contributors to resources we all share, full members and participants and providers in our civic, social, economic, and cultural body. 

This piece is not intended as a compare and contrast essay on the Adult Education Matters and Black Lives Matter movements.  I will not go through them, point by point, to showcase where and how they are similar and different.

I do want to make clear, however, that both movements are pushing back against perceptions that have bound and shamed important members of our people as effectively as shackles and chains. 

How we see things, how we understand them, is always where everything begins.

Funding Adult Education is NOT an economic problem.  There is PLENTY of money for education this year.  Every branch of public education in California received an increase in Governor Brown's budget proposal.  Only Adult Education did not see an increase.

Adult Education Budget
Slide from CFT 2016 State Convention
workshop on the California Budget

Community College
Slide from same source

Early Childhood Ed Budget
Note that Governor Brown wants to
create a Block Grant for Early Childhood,
similar to Adult Education

K12 Budget

UC Budget
(no slide was provided for CSU system)










Why? 

Why must Adult Education "prove" that it can wisely spend 250 million less than what it used to handle well? 

Adult Schools were ALWAYS the cheapest, most cost-effective branch of public education, a system that could turn on a dime to open or close classes.  A system with the lowest overhead and teaching pay (outside of Early Childhood Education - which says something how about how we perceive the value of caring for and educating young children). 

So why, after being completely re-shaped, must it now "prove" that it can handle money well?

Why, for that matter, was it made the blood donor to the K12 system during the financial crisis?

Even more ironic, why was funding for Adult Education Financial Literacy eliminated after the financial crisis?

No branch of Public Education caused the financial crisis.  Big banks, Wall Street, and lack of federal oversight and accountability caused it.  (See:  The Big Short.)   Education, social services and maintenance and improvements to public infrastructure were cut.  "Regular people" paid the price not only in terms of cuts that greatly impacted their lives but also literally, through federal taxes that bailed out the banks.  And since California pays more into the federal system than it takes out, we paid more than our share. 

All branches of Public Education in California were cut by Governor Schwartzenegger and the Legislature in response to the financial meltdown.  Nothing surprising there.  But only the Adult School system was made into a donor system for another branch, a choice which nearly caused its death.

Broadly speaking, Adult Schools survived in some form in the most affluent of areas and were worst cut or eliminated in the poorest.  In other words, they were eliminated from where they were needed most and retained where they were needed least.   (They are needed everywhere but these remain the facts and you get my point.)

The truth that children do best - academically, socially, and physically - when raised by parents with access to economic, civic, and linguistic means, and not devastated by poverty, racism, anti-immigrant hatred, and other burdens - seemed invisible to Governor Schwartzenegger and the Legislature.  

You do not lift children up by removing access to education from their parents, extended family, and community.

You don't save K12 programs by eliminating Adult Education.  In fact, you hurt them.

Governor Jerry Brown understood there is inequity in the state our culture and the K12 system and came up with the Local Control Funding Formula as a means to address it.  But perhaps because he grew up with wealth, status, and privilege, and is not, himself, a parent or caregiver, he has failed to make the connection that children are raised by parents, families and communities and that a healthy social bank is just as important to our mental, physical, civic, and economic health as a financial bank.  He seems to see workforce training as the solution to all things economic. 

Sad and ironic, given his own education, which was far from workforce focused.  Both Jesuit schools and UC Berkeley are known for their reverence of learning and inquiry and it was his education from these institutions, along with the privilege, status, and connections he was born to, that Governor Brown owes much of his success to.  Sure, he made much of them - and hats off to him for doing so - but had he grown up poor, brown, undocumented, gone to a workforce focused charter school "Academy," obtained his GED at an underfunded Adult School, and then to a college he could "afford," I doubt he'd be the man he is today.  On some level, he knows that - and thus his efforts to work for justice - and very real and valuable efforts they are.  I publically thank him for them.  At the same time, he seems blinded to some of what most helped him - not just privilege and money, but a certain kind of education.  An education that was predicated on the value of learning as a process, not just a means to a measurable result.  Why does he get to have such an education but others don't? 

That's not fair - and just as importantly - it's detrimental to our social, civic, and economic health as a state. 

We will not find the solutions to all our problems in workforce training.   College and career are not the answer to everything.   And not everything of value can be measured on a six month or six year scale. 

Here I refer you to this post because I've already written more than intended on this thread of the tapestry. I want return now to the central thread - which is that allocation of funding is based on perception of value - not just on how much there is spend.

If Adult Education - and most importantly, if the people whom Adult Education serves - were valued to the same extent as other branches (and people) - it would be adequately funded.

This is especially clear in years of plenty - as this year is.

In years of lean, we can expect cuts to all branches of Public Education and we can expect deeper cuts to branches deemed less necessary to the survival of the tree.  These are what are called "hard choices."  You have ten dollars.  You have to feed six people.  Yes, everyone should have five servings of fruits and vegetables a day.  But you don't have money for that.  So you buy rice and beans and some onion and garlic and some tomatoes.  You make it work.  When there is more money, on a different day, you buy salad and chicken and if there is a lot of money, you may even buy ice cream.  That's understanding how life works and keeping people alive.

(Sorry if I moved from trimming trees to feeding a family.  Hopefully you understood what I was saying.  And at least I didn't talk about picking apples off trimmed trees and making pie and applesauce... although come to think of it... )

But this is not a year of lean.  It is a year of plenty.  Every branch of Public Education is getting more.  Except Adult Education.

And... and also very importantly... this happened at the same time that Adult Education was forced to change.  And change in a way that not everyone liked, wanted, or asked for.

There is a lot of pressure within the Adult School community to keep quiet about what we don't like. This is not necessarily top-down.  It is so internalized we do it with ourselves and with each other.  This is a not uncommon phenomenon in groups which are lower down in a power hierarchy.  Keep your head down.  Don't ask for too much.  Don't be angry.  Anger scares people, including people with power.  Don't make the people with power angry.  Don't mention injustice.  Be the good group, the good individual.  Prove your worth.  Make a case for your value with stats and facts and ask for less than others get to be sure you'll get something - and then be sure to write a thank you note afterwards. 

In shifting that, pushing back and speaking up, we see again the connection with the Black Lives Matter movement.  The Black Lives Matter movement is not apologizing for pointing out there is inequity.  The Black Lives Matter movement is not apologizing for pointing out that Americans of African ancestry have great worth and bring great value and gifts and contributions to the nation that is the United States, even though they have suffered injustice and oppression and continually sustained assaults and cultural badmouthing for over four hundred years since they were first enslaved and brought here in chains.  And all that makes a lot of people uncomfortable.  So the uncomfortable people and the scared people and the people benefiting the power structure as it exists now tell the Black Lives Matter movement to be quiet.

There is a similar dynamic in education circles.  Adult Schools should not ask for too much.  We should be happy with what we get.  We should not mention that mostly, Adult Schools did not ask for the new Regional Consortia system.  It was not our idea.  Because of the global financial meltdown and the consequent cuts to Public Education, in particular to us, we were put in a difficult situation where to survive and receive any money at all, we had to accept a new system, a system in which we'd have to work with and share funds with a group that had, on occasion, lobbied for our takeover
We would then have to operate under confusing new rules, help build and operate under a new system and new forms of bureaucracy (the Regional Consortia System and the Adult Education Block Grant), which was a tremendous amount of work, not to mention sometimes a huge headache, especially for the administrators who had to do all this extra work for free. 

And let's not forget the cost of eliminating four programs we had provided for decades.  Funding for Older Adults and Parent Education - essentially eliminated.  Older Adults classes can be funded if they lead to employment.  One doesn't have to think hard to understand why a governor in his seventies would like that idea.  And Parent Education is okay only as narrowly defined.  But the idea of simply supporting Parents in a variety of ways?  Understanding their role as a child's first and most important teachers?  No.  Gone.  Just like funding for Financial Literacy and Home Economics.   Many schools had already eliminated these programs because of the cuts and/or because it was clear that funding for them would be eliminated.  Those schools which retained them had to now find a way to fund them - either through the narrow parameters of the Adult Education Block Grant or through fees.  Everyone had to let staff go, watch valuable programs die, and see communities go unserved.  There is a very human cost to all that.  And given the value of these programs (as outlined earlier in this massively long perspective piece), an economic one, too.

So... Adult Education first defunded, then reshaped.  Then further funding is withheld till we can "prove" that we can handle money and this new system well. 

If that doesn't sound like a carrot and a stick to accept a new system we didn't ask for, I don't know what does.

Especially considering Adult Schools do not have a reputation for mismanaging funds.

Again, let's remember:  Adult Schools did not cause the global financial meltdown.  Bankers and Wall Street did.  Probably a large number of whom went to prestigious private institutions of higher learning on the East Coast.  Do those institutions value learning for learning's sake?  I don't really know.  Just like Brown, I went to UC Berkeley.  I do know that both public and private universities are reflections of our culture, itself still mired in inequity, and both public and private universities invest in companies that do bad business in this world.  Public universities, however, are bound by covenant to serve the public.  They must try, at least some of the time, to do so.  And the University of California system is entrusted with funds to research on the public's behalf.  Ivy League schools were founded to educate the elite and keep them in power.  When their graduates continue to do that, as many of the bankers and Wall Streets folks do, I am not surprised.  When their graduates do otherwise, I am happy and grateful. 

And again, I have to sit for a minute for this weird truth:  The near demolition of Adult Education was the result of Global Meltdown Domino Effect - and one of the dominoes that went down as a result was state-funded Adult Education classes in Financial Literacy.  What?!   Yeah, and I only ever heard one legislator speak to this.  Thank you, Assembly Member Reggie Jones-Sawyer.   Why am I not surprised he comes from a family who were pioneers in the Civil Rights Movement?  Again, things connect.  We just have to see the connections.

The LAO - the Legislative Analyst Office - in it's 2012 Report on Restructuring Adult Education - never found fault with Adult School financial management.  It said there should be better coordination between Adult Schools and Community Colleges.

The LAO did recommend narrowing the mission of Adult Schools.  It recommended narrowing to a work and civics focus, what it perceived as the "core mission" of Adult Education.  Although, if you look at the history of Adult Education, you can see that "core mission" has changed a lot over the past 150 years.  Thank you again to Kristen Pursely, for researching and detailing the history of Adult Education in California.

But yes, let's stop and think about the LAO's take on the core mission, for a minute.  Where, really, do you hear talk in all that is going on about civics?  Where is the emphasis on citizenship classes?  Where is the emphasis on immigrants becoming voters?  Where is the emphasis on residents and citizens of California fully understanding our complex civic life so that they can participate in it?  How many times have you heard the Governor, the Legislature, or any unions, state agencies, coalitions, or immigrant organizations talk about this?  Yes.  Not many.  I think this is not because folks in these groups think civics is unimportant but because in the rush toward "College & Career," civics was forgotten or ignored - and that speaks to priorities.  Maybe civics is considered important - but not as important as work.  And why is that? 

Hmmm... complex.  Do we really want everyone to engage in civic life?  To understand how things work and speak up about them?  Do we really want everyone to obtain citizenship and once obtained, to vote?  I think the answer is "that depends."  That depends on who is thinking about the situation and who would be learning more about how things work and what they would think about it and what would they say and to whom and who would be becoming citizens and who would be voting and what they would be voting for.  Real democracy is scary.  It's hard, complex, messy, and it doesn't always go the way we want it to.  That's why we so often try to control or obstruct it.  Whatever we try to control is powerful and even with a saddle, reins, and a bit, a horse can run away.  And when a lot of horses run in the same direction, some of us fear we'll be trampled.

As to why the LAO considered work to be the other part of Adult Education's core mission, well, I can guess it is because we as a culture do not value relational skills, social banks, families, community connections.  We consider these things to be "soft skills" and our culture likes "hard" - hard skills, hard data, hard men, I really want to talk about Trump's hands here but I'm going to restrain myself.

Parent Education and Older Adults programs strengthen and maintain families and social relationships.   In turn, these social banks relationships maintain mental, physical, civic and economic health.  But these are not connections are culture currently sees.  We don't see the connection between the social bank and the economic bank.   We don't see they are two banks of the same river, two sides to the coin of our people.  Our wealth begins and ends in our health.

Think about it, the word "wealth" - has it's root in "weal" - well being, health, abundance, happiness.  The people's health, well-being, and happiness are in direct relationship to the economy.  We tend to see this as flowing in one direction only.  Poverty creates misery, that kind of thing.  And it's true, it does.  But we fail to see where the people's health - mentally, socially, physically, their well-being - creates wealth.  Michael Moore does.   As so do many countries around the world.  This is what his new documentary, "Where To Invade Next" is about.  See it, as well as "The Big Short." 

Our culture sees value in work - although not enough value to pay it well - thus the Fight for Fifteen Movement - yet another movement that is about pushing back on how we view people working "unskilled labor" jobs. 

There is no such thing as unskilled labor.   Taking care of children, being patient with difficult customers, cooking safe to eat, delicious food, planting and harvesting crops, caring for old people, providing customer service over the phone - all these jobs and every job receiving minimum wage require a wide and important array of skills.  If they didn't, we wouldn't complain so loudly when they are performed badly.

Before I became a teacher, I was a housecleaner, nanny, caregiver for older folks, and gardener.  Basically, I took care of things that were alive, with the aim to help them thrive.  There was a lot of skill involved.  Just as much skill as in what I do now.  But not much pay.  And definitely not much respect.  Even more shocking than receiving decent pay and benefits when I became a teacher, was receiving respect.  For me, it felt strange to have people respect me - simply because of my job title.  I never received that kind of respect in my work caring for children and old people, even though that work is - in my opinion - more valuable and sometimes much harder.  But our culture doesn't respect such work.  Not really.  It's not high up in the hierarchy of labor. 

Why?  Well, it doesn't take much pondering to realize that "women's work" and work close to the earth and the body - soil and bodies that soil, food and what digests our food, anything to do with producing life, including women's bodies, is a very complicated thing for our culture.  We want these things.  We want life, the earth and all it provides us, women and all they provide us.  On some level we value these things.  On the other hand, something is going on - because we don't acknowledge their value in an open and honest way.  Give us the food but don't make us value the earth or the people who bring it to us, who plant it, pick it, truck it, cook it, serve it - or pay them well.  Give us the children but don't make us value the women who grow them inside their bodies or the people who raise them.  Don't make us give respect or provide adequate support or pay, for giving life and care to children, families, communities, and old people. 

Work that has traditionally been done by women or has a close relationship to the earth, food, bodies, the natural world of which we are a part and owe our life to - is generally low-paid and disrespected in our culture. For hundreds of years, African people were kidnapped and enslaved to do these jobs and/or kept in conditions close to slavery.  Where Americans of any ethnic background don't or won't do this work, immigrants who are low in power and status are enlisted to do it, a classic example of this being the fact that half of our food is harvested by undocumented immigrants from Mexico and Central America.  Often this work is divided into "women's work" - caring for people of all ages and cleaning where we live and work - and "men's work" - planting and harvesting crops, raising and slaughtering animals.  Men's work is almost always higher in both pay and status.   The need for this work to be done as a normal part of human existence coupled with the fact that many people do not want to do it for reasons ranging from low pay and status to the level of difficulty involved is why the United States has a constant need for immigrants whether or not we allow them legal status.  For more on this topic, read Nancy Folbre, economist, especially her book, "The Invisible Heart:  Economics and Family Values."   

Okay, wow, I am suddenly struck by the fact that Arnold Schwarzenegger, an immigrant from Austria and the governor who made Adult Schools the sacrificial lamb during the financial crisis, signaling his belief that Adult Education, a large part of which is ESL for immigrants, particularly from Mexico and Central America, doesn't matter...

... that this same man, during the time he made decisions that sharply reduced access to ESL classes, was denying any acknowledgement of a sexual relationship with his housekeeper, an immigrant from Guatemala...  as well as the child they conceived, a son who looked like him, a son just a few days younger than the son he conceived with his wife, Maria Shriver, a member of the Kennedy clan, as close as we come to American royalty.  All this happening in the same time period, the same household, everyone rotating around each other and aware of each other but only some folks fully acknowledged and valued as family.  It's like the Californian version of Strom Thurmond

We on the West Coast are quick to see and call out the problems in the South -  slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings, etc. while failing to see that as white is to black in the South, white is to brown in the West.  Latino and Asian immigrants, in particular but not exclusively, have been exploited and oppressed.  How many Californians graduate from our K12 system knowing about Brown vs Board of Education but nothing about Mendez vs Westminister, the 1947 case in addressing the same separate but equal issues that the Brown case did, but focused on Latinos in California?  I am one of those Californians who was never taught this - and not only did I get what would be considered a very good pre-prop 13 education, three years of that education were in schools in Calexico, a small town on the Mexican border, where this information would have been of special importance.

So knowing all that, let's stop and think for a minute about an Austrian-born Governor who deprives immigrants, the majority of whom are from Mexico or Central American, access to ESL classes while also depriving his Guatemalan-born lover and their "love child" recognition, financial support, and respect.   If that seems like I'm "pushing it," imagine the story were set in the South and his housekeeper was African-American and he cut funding for programs which significantly benefit African-Americans.  Would it still seem so outlandish? 

My point here is not Arnold but us. Our culture, of which he's a member.

What and whom did Arnold value and desire?  And what and whom did he publically value and fund?  It's one thing to desire or value something or someone and another to do so openly and honestly and literally pay them their due - with respect.

Back to our discussion of work and skilled and unskilled labor and what is valued... someone's benefiting when these some jobs are not framed as "skilled" and the people working them are not framed as of the same worth as the people employing them - and it's not the people working the jobs.

This is another long thread that we could follow but time being what it is and it being a miracle if anyone is still reading at this point, I refer you again to this post (if you want to read it) and move back to the central thread...

... which is, to say it again... that funding Adult Education is not an economic problem - it is a perceptual one.

If we perceive immigrants - and all immigrants, not just H-1 visa immigrants or immigrants that are venture capitalists or Governor but also the people who picked the food you ate a littler earlier today - and your immigrant housekeeper and old people and children and people who didn't finish high school and people struggling with economic and social injustice and the incarcerated or the formerly incarcerated or anyone else we put in the "other" box - as just as valuable as "us" (who and whatever that is) - then we are making choices about how we spend out money - the money created by us, all of us, together the makers of the EIGHTH LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD - and yes, that's including the people who picked the cherry tomatoes you ate at lunch and worked in the slaughterhouse that produced the all white meat, no skin, no bone chicken breast you'll eat for dinner.

... if we do that, if see value in all people and all work, then we choose to spend money on Adult Education.

And we don't make the choice to punish people or Adult Education by continually defunding or destabilizing their programs.  And we don't hold out carrots while threatening sticks until they quietly do as they're told as if they are bad little children who must be taught to sit up straight and behave right.

And we find the courage within ourselves to say what we see, to embolden one another with the truth, to cheer one another on by sharing what we see and know, so that each of us doesn't feel so alone.  We talk about our value, our strengths, our gifts, and our accomplishments.  Because, when you have continually been told you don't matter, it takes courage to say that you do.

And we give voice to the truth of what happened and how it affected us and how we feel about it.  To talk about the fatigue, the discouragement, the cost of all this to us.  I have seen people go down through this process, to fall apart physically, to give in to discouragement, bitterness, cynicism, or despair, to disconnect and give up on things ever being better than what they are now.  So rather than give away our power to despair, we mourn, cry, stamp our feet, and grieve what has been lost.

And then we look at the crap.  We don't turn away in aversion.  We put on our spectacles and look at it as something we, the people, have created.  We try to figure out how it got there, what it's made of, and if it can be used as fertilizer.   And we go on, making the best of things and viewing everyone - including the folks who may have intended us harm, as other people of equal value to ourselves.  People we may need to be watchful of, maybe, until they learn better.  But people.  Just like us. 

And then we get all kinds of benefits.

We can begin to see the full picture.  We can see our worth and our weaknesses.  Our value and our vulnerability.  We can see have power, both alone and together - and that we use our power to help and to harm.  We can see that as a culture, we've elevated some talents, some jobs, some people above others, creating a hierarchy of worth where there is none.  We can see there is value in all people and worth in all work.  We can see our inter-connectedness.  We can set down the shame we all carry for needing love, attention, connection, food, tenderness, and touch and receive what we need  - without having to manipulate and exploit and devalue others in order to get our needs met.  

We need each other.  That's the truth of being human.  And a beautiful truth it is, too, because it speaks to our underlying unity.  We are not, in fact "rugged individuals" who exist alone, birthed out of rock and sky.  We are a group species who, from the very beginning, are about connection.  Even in a test tube, it takes two to make a thing all right.  The only thing in this world we can truly do alone is die.  Everything else depends on others - most especially our creation, birth, and survival, not to mention, language, culture, and happiness.   When we can embrace that, we will no longer need to hurt and harm each other to meet our needs. We can share and negotiate as equals. 

That's wonderful and important and liberating, all by itself.   We could stop right here!

But there's this other thing:

Seeing things clearly is a skill.  It's a skill that can be learned and strengthened and sharpened and improved.

But it can't be learned or strengthened if we don't use it. 

And why is this so important?

Because far, far bigger than the Teacher of Global Financial Meltdown is another Teacher... now appearing in classrooms all over the world.

Climate Change.

Our friend. Our enemy.  Our master.  Our liberator.

And if we do not begin to get into the habit of seeing the truth of things... of not finger pointing and blaming and badmouthing and hating... of not denying and repressing and cowering and shaking...  of not putting our heads in the ground and remaining bassakwards to what is real...

we are not going to make it.

Denial is a habit and whenever we practice it, we strengthen it just as wherever we set it down, it shrinks and becomes harder to take up again.

Climate Change, as no other teacher before it, is here to teach us that truth is not be feared but learned from.

Indeed, it is all that can set us free.







This is a perspective piece by myself, Cynthia Eagleton.  I am the facilitator of this blog and I try to provide information and inspiration to renew and rebuild Adult Education.  From time to time, I share my own perspectives as well as the perspectives of others.

In this particular perspective piece, I weave a lot of threads into a tapestry that may or may not make sense to you.  Some threads may seem obvious and true to you and others may seen invisible or wrong.  Like everyone, I have blind spots which I cannot see and vantages from I view things and these affect how I perceive things and what I think of them.  Bottom line, read at risk of disagreement or dismay.  Then again, you might agree in whole or part.  Either way, I hope it will stimulate you to consider your own perspective, your own blind spots, and how important it is for all of us to describe the part of the problem each of us can see, so that together, we can identify the animal in the center of the classroom.



I came up with the phrase "Adult Education Matters" as a means to address a perceptual problem.  At about the same time, in the way the cultural zeitgeist works, someone else came up with the phrase, "Black Lives Matter" to address a different but not unrelated perceptual problem.

It would be some time before I heard the phrase, "Black Lives Matter," but when I did, I instantly understood it's value and why it was quickly taken up by the movement. 

Both the Black Lives Matter movement and the movement to restore Adult Education in California are rooted in efforts to shift how we see things, to reframe what and who has been perceived as a "problem," to assert the value of people often pathologized, feared, denied, marginalized, and painted as a "drain" on resources, rather than as mighty and precious contributors to resources we all share, full members and participants and providers in our civic, social, economic, and cultural body. 

This piece is not intended as a compare and contrast essay on the Adult Education Matters and Black Lives Matter movements.  I will not go through them, point by point, to showcase where and how they are similar and different.

I do want to make clear, however, that both movements are pushing back against perceptions that have bound and shamed important members of our people as effectively as shackles and chains. 

How we see things, how we understand them, is always where everything begins.

Funding Adult Education is NOT an economic problem.  There is PLENTY of money for education this year.  Every branch of public education in California received an increase in Governor Brown's budget proposal.  Only Adult Education did not see an increase.

Adult Education Budget
Slide from CFT 2016 State Convention
workshop on the California Budget

Community College
Slide from same source

Early Childhood Ed Budget
Note that Governor Brown wants to
create a Block Grant for Early Childhood,
similar to Adult Education

K12 Budget

UC Budget
(no slide was provided for CSU system)










Why? 

Why must Adult Education "prove" that it can wisely spend 250 million less than what it used to handle well? 

Adult Schools were ALWAYS the cheapest, most cost-effective branch of public education, a system that could turn on a dime to open or close classes.  A system with the lowest overhead and teaching pay (outside of Early Childhood Education - which says something how about how we perceive the value of caring for and educating young children). 

So why, after being completely re-shaped, must it now "prove" that it can handle money well?

Why, for that matter, was it made the blood donor to the K12 system during the financial crisis?

Even more ironic, why was funding for Adult Education Financial Literacy eliminated after the financial crisis?

No branch of Public Education caused the financial crisis.  Big banks, Wall Street, and lack of federal oversight and accountability caused it.  (See:  The Big Short.)   Education, social services and maintenance and improvements to public infrastructure were cut.  "Regular people" paid the price not only in terms of cuts that greatly impacted their lives but also literally, through federal taxes that bailed out the banks.  And since California pays more into the federal system than it takes out, we paid more than our share. 

All branches of Public Education in California were cut by Governor Schwartzenegger and the Legislature in response to the financial meltdown.  Nothing surprising there.  But only the Adult School system was made into a donor system for another branch, a choice which nearly caused its death.

Broadly speaking, Adult Schools survived in some form in the most affluent of areas and were worst cut or eliminated in the poorest.  In other words, they were eliminated from where they were needed most and retained where they were needed least.   (They are needed everywhere but these remain the facts and you get my point.)

The truth that children do best - academically, socially, and physically - when raised by parents with access to economic, civic, and linguistic means, and not devastated by poverty, racism, anti-immigrant hatred, and other burdens - seemed invisible to Governor Schwartzenegger and the Legislature.  

You do not lift children up by removing access to education from their parents, extended family, and community.

You don't save K12 programs by eliminating Adult Education.  In fact, you hurt them.

Governor Jerry Brown understood there is inequity in the state our culture and the K12 system and came up with the Local Control Funding Formula as a means to address it.  But perhaps because he grew up with wealth, status, and privilege, and is not, himself, a parent or caregiver, he has failed to make the connection that children are raised by parents, families and communities and that a healthy social bank is just as important to our mental, physical, civic, and economic health as a financial bank.  He seems to see workforce training as the solution to all things economic. 

Sad and ironic, given his own education, which was far from workforce focused.  Both Jesuit schools and UC Berkeley are known for their reverence of learning and inquiry and it was his education from these institutions, along with the privilege, status, and connections he was born to, that Governor Brown owes much of his success to.  Sure, he made much of them - and hats off to him for doing so - but had he grown up poor, brown, undocumented, gone to a workforce focused charter school "Academy," obtained his GED at an underfunded Adult School, and then to a college he could "afford," I doubt he'd be the man he is today.  On some level, he knows that - and thus his efforts to work for justice - and very real and valuable efforts they are.  I publically thank him for them.  At the same time, he seems blinded to some of what most helped him - not just privilege and money, but a certain kind of education.  An education that was predicated on the value of learning as a process, not just a means to a measurable result.  Why does he get to have such an education but others don't? 

That's not fair - and just as importantly - it's detrimental to our social, civic, and economic health as a state. 

We will not find the solutions to all our problems in workforce training.   College and career are not the answer to everything.   And not everything of value can be measured on a six month or six year scale. 

Here I refer you to this post because I've already written more than intended on this thread of the tapestry. I want return now to the central thread - which is that allocation of funding is based on perception of value - not just on how much there is spend.

If Adult Education - and most importantly, if the people whom Adult Education serves - were valued to the same extent as other branches (and people) - it would be adequately funded.

This is especially clear in years of plenty - as this year is.

In years of lean, we can expect cuts to all branches of Public Education and we can expect deeper cuts to branches deemed less necessary to the survival of the tree.  These are what are called "hard choices."  You have ten dollars.  You have to feed six people.  Yes, everyone should have five servings of fruits and vegetables a day.  But you don't have money for that.  So you buy rice and beans and some onion and garlic and some tomatoes.  You make it work.  When there is more money, on a different day, you buy salad and chicken and if there is a lot of money, you may even buy ice cream.  That's understanding how life works and keeping people alive.

(Sorry if I moved from trimming trees to feeding a family.  Hopefully you understood what I was saying.  And at least I didn't talk about picking apples off trimmed trees and making pie and applesauce... although come to think of it... )

But this is not a year of lean.  It is a year of plenty.  Every branch of Public Education is getting more.  Except Adult Education.

And... and also very importantly... this happened at the same time that Adult Education was forced to change.  And change in a way that not everyone liked, wanted, or asked for.

There is a lot of pressure within the Adult School community to keep quiet about what we don't like. This is not necessarily top-down.  It is so internalized we do it with ourselves and with each other.  This is a not uncommon phenomenon in groups which are lower down in a power hierarchy.  Keep your head down.  Don't ask for too much.  Don't be angry.  Anger scares people, including people with power.  Don't make the people with power angry.  Don't mention injustice.  Be the good group, the good individual.  Prove your worth.  Make a case for your value with stats and facts and ask for less than others get to be sure you'll get something - and then be sure to write a thank you note afterwards. 

In shifting that, pushing back and speaking up, we see again the connection with the Black Lives Matter movement.  The Black Lives Matter movement is not apologizing for pointing out there is inequity.  The Black Lives Matter movement is not apologizing for pointing out that Americans of African ancestry have great worth and bring great value and gifts and contributions to the nation that is the United States, even though they have suffered injustice and oppression and continually sustained assaults and cultural badmouthing for over four hundred years since they were first enslaved and brought here in chains.  And all that makes a lot of people uncomfortable.  So the uncomfortable people and the scared people and the people benefiting the power structure as it exists now tell the Black Lives Matter movement to be quiet.

There is a similar dynamic in education circles.  Adult Schools should not ask for too much.  We should be happy with what we get.  We should not mention that mostly, Adult Schools did not ask for the new Regional Consortia system.  It was not our idea.  Because of the global financial meltdown and the consequent cuts to Public Education, in particular to us, we were put in a difficult situation where to survive and receive any money at all, we had to accept a new system, a system in which we'd have to work with and share funds with a group that had, on occasion, lobbied for our takeover
We would then have to operate under confusing new rules, help build and operate under a new system and new forms of bureaucracy (the Regional Consortia System and the Adult Education Block Grant), which was a tremendous amount of work, not to mention sometimes a huge headache, especially for the administrators who had to do all this extra work for free. 

And let's not forget the cost of eliminating four programs we had provided for decades.  Funding for Older Adults and Parent Education - essentially eliminated.  Older Adults classes can be funded if they lead to employment.  One doesn't have to think hard to understand why a governor in his seventies would like that idea.  And Parent Education is okay only as narrowly defined.  But the idea of simply supporting Parents in a variety of ways?  Understanding their role as a child's first and most important teachers?  No.  Gone.  Just like funding for Financial Literacy and Home Economics.   Many schools had already eliminated these programs because of the cuts and/or because it was clear that funding for them would be eliminated.  Those schools which retained them had to now find a way to fund them - either through the narrow parameters of the Adult Education Block Grant or through fees.  Everyone had to let staff go, watch valuable programs die, and see communities go unserved.  There is a very human cost to all that.  And given the value of these programs (as outlined earlier in this massively long perspective piece), an economic one, too.

So... Adult Education first defunded, then reshaped.  Then further funding is withheld till we can "prove" that we can handle money and this new system well. 

If that doesn't sound like a carrot and a stick to accept a new system we didn't ask for, I don't know what does.

Especially considering Adult Schools do not have a reputation for mismanaging funds.

Again, let's remember:  Adult Schools did not cause the global financial meltdown.  Bankers and Wall Street did.  Probably a large number of whom went to prestigious private institutions of higher learning on the East Coast.  Do those institutions value learning for learning's sake?  I don't really know.  Just like Brown, I went to UC Berkeley.  I do know that both public and private universities are reflections of our culture, itself still mired in inequity, and both public and private universities invest in companies that do bad business in this world.  Public universities, however, are bound by covenant to serve the public.  They must try, at least some of the time, to do so.  And the University of California system is entrusted with funds to research on the public's behalf.  Ivy League schools were founded to educate the elite and keep them in power.  When their graduates continue to do that, as many of the bankers and Wall Streets folks do, I am not surprised.  When their graduates do otherwise, I am happy and grateful. 

And again, I have to sit for a minute for this weird truth:  The near demolition of Adult Education was the result of Global Meltdown Domino Effect - and one of the dominoes that went down as a result was state-funded Adult Education classes in Financial Literacy.  What?!   Yeah, and I only ever heard one legislator speak to this.  Thank you, Assembly Member Reggie Jones-Sawyer.   Why am I not surprised he comes from a family who were pioneers in the Civil Rights Movement?  Again, things connect.  We just have to see the connections.

The LAO - the Legislative Analyst Office - in it's 2012 Report on Restructuring Adult Education - never found fault with Adult School financial management.  It said there should be better coordination between Adult Schools and Community Colleges.

The LAO did recommend narrowing the mission of Adult Schools.  It recommended narrowing to a work and civics focus, what it perceived as the "core mission" of Adult Education.  Although, if you look at the history of Adult Education, you can see that "core mission" has changed a lot over the past 150 years.  Thank you again to Kristen Pursely, for researching and detailing the history of Adult Education in California.

But yes, let's stop and think about the LAO's take on the core mission, for a minute.  Where, really, do you hear talk in all that is going on about civics?  Where is the emphasis on citizenship classes?  Where is the emphasis on immigrants becoming voters?  Where is the emphasis on residents and citizens of California fully understanding our complex civic life so that they can participate in it?  How many times have you heard the Governor, the Legislature, or any unions, state agencies, coalitions, or immigrant organizations talk about this?  Yes.  Not many.  I think this is not because folks in these groups think civics is unimportant but because in the rush toward "College & Career," civics was forgotten or ignored - and that speaks to priorities.  Maybe civics is considered important - but not as important as work.  And why is that? 

Hmmm... complex.  Do we really want everyone to engage in civic life?  To understand how things work and speak up about them?  Do we really want everyone to obtain citizenship and once obtained, to vote?  I think the answer is "that depends."  That depends on who is thinking about the situation and who would be learning more about how things work and what they would think about it and what would they say and to whom and who would be becoming citizens and who would be voting and what they would be voting for.  Real democracy is scary.  It's hard, complex, messy, and it doesn't always go the way we want it to.  That's why we so often try to control or obstruct it.  Whatever we try to control is powerful and even with a saddle, reins, and a bit, a horse can run away.  And when a lot of horses run in the same direction, some of us fear we'll be trampled.

As to why the LAO considered work to be the other part of Adult Education's core mission, well, I can guess it is because we as a culture do not value relational skills, social banks, families, community connections.  We consider these things to be "soft skills" and our culture likes "hard" - hard skills, hard data, hard men, I really want to talk about Trump's hands here but I'm going to restrain myself.

Parent Education and Older Adults programs strengthen and maintain families and social relationships.   In turn, these social banks relationships maintain mental, physical, civic and economic health.  But these are not connections are culture currently sees.  We don't see the connection between the social bank and the economic bank.   We don't see they are two banks of the same river, two sides to the coin of our people.  Our wealth begins and ends in our health.

Think about it, the word "wealth" - has it's root in "weal" - well being, health, abundance, happiness.  The people's health, well-being, and happiness are in direct relationship to the economy.  We tend to see this as flowing in one direction only.  Poverty creates misery, that kind of thing.  And it's true, it does.  But we fail to see where the people's health - mentally, socially, physically, their well-being - creates wealth.  Michael Moore does.   As so do many countries around the world.  This is what his new documentary, "Where To Invade Next" is about.  See it, as well as "The Big Short." 

Our culture sees value in work - although not enough value to pay it well - thus the Fight for Fifteen Movement - yet another movement that is about pushing back on how we view people working "unskilled labor" jobs. 

There is no such thing as unskilled labor.   Taking care of children, being patient with difficult customers, cooking safe to eat, delicious food, planting and harvesting crops, caring for old people, providing customer service over the phone - all these jobs and every job receiving minimum wage require a wide and important array of skills.  If they didn't, we wouldn't complain so loudly when they are performed badly.

Before I became a teacher, I was a housecleaner, nanny, caregiver for older folks, and gardener.  Basically, I took care of things that were alive, with the aim to help them thrive.  There was a lot of skill involved.  Just as much skill as in what I do now.  But not much pay.  And definitely not much respect.  Even more shocking than receiving decent pay and benefits when I became a teacher, was receiving respect.  For me, it felt strange to have people respect me - simply because of my job title.  I never received that kind of respect in my work caring for children and old people, even though that work is - in my opinion - more valuable and sometimes much harder.  But our culture doesn't respect such work.  Not really.  It's not high up in the hierarchy of labor. 

Why?  Well, it doesn't take much pondering to realize that "women's work" and work close to the earth and the body - soil and bodies that soil, food and what digests our food, anything to do with producing life, including women's bodies, is a very complicated thing for our culture.  We want these things.  We want life, the earth and all it provides us, women and all they provide us.  On some level we value these things.  On the other hand, something is going on - because we don't acknowledge their value in an open and honest way.  Give us the food but don't make us value the earth or the people who bring it to us, who plant it, pick it, truck it, cook it, serve it - or pay them well.  Give us the children but don't make us value the women who grow them inside their bodies or the people who raise them.  Don't make us give respect or provide adequate support or pay, for giving life and care to children, families, communities, and old people. 

Work that has traditionally been done by women or has a close relationship to the earth, food, bodies, the natural world of which we are a part and owe our life to - is generally low-paid and disrespected in our culture. For hundreds of years, African people were kidnapped and enslaved to do these jobs and/or kept in conditions close to slavery.  Where Americans of any ethnic background don't or won't do this work, immigrants who are low in power and status are enlisted to do it, a classic example of this being the fact that half of our food is harvested by undocumented immigrants from Mexico and Central America.  Often this work is divided into "women's work" - caring for people of all ages and cleaning where we live and work - and "men's work" - planting and harvesting crops, raising and slaughtering animals.  Men's work is almost always higher in both pay and status.   The need for this work to be done as a normal part of human existence coupled with the fact that many people do not want to do it for reasons ranging from low pay and status to the level of difficulty involved is why the United States has a constant need for immigrants whether or not we allow them legal status.  For more on this topic, read Nancy Folbre, economist, especially her book, "The Invisible Heart:  Economics and Family Values."   

Okay, wow, I am suddenly struck by the fact that Arnold Schwarzenegger, an immigrant from Austria and the governor who made Adult Schools the sacrificial lamb during the financial crisis, signaling his belief that Adult Education, a large part of which is ESL for immigrants, particularly from Mexico and Central America, doesn't matter...

... that this same man, during the time he made decisions that sharply reduced access to ESL classes, was denying any acknowledgement of a sexual relationship with his housekeeper, an immigrant from Guatemala...  as well as the child they conceived, a son who looked like him, a son just a few days younger than the son he conceived with his wife, Maria Shriver, a member of the Kennedy clan, as close as we come to American royalty.  All this happening in the same time period, the same household, everyone rotating around each other and aware of each other but only some folks fully acknowledged and valued as family.  It's like the Californian version of Strom Thurmond

We on the West Coast are quick to see and call out the problems in the South -  slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings, etc. while failing to see that as white is to black in the South, white is to brown in the West.  Latino and Asian immigrants, in particular but not exclusively, have been exploited and oppressed.  How many Californians graduate from our K12 system knowing about Brown vs Board of Education but nothing about Mendez vs Westminister, the 1947 case in addressing the same separate but equal issues that the Brown case did, but focused on Latinos in California?  I am one of those Californians who was never taught this - and not only did I get what would be considered a very good pre-prop 13 education, three years of that education were in schools in Calexico, a small town on the Mexican border, where this information would have been of special importance.

So knowing all that, let's stop and think for a minute about an Austrian-born Governor who deprives immigrants, the majority of whom are from Mexico or Central American, access to ESL classes while also depriving his Guatemalan-born lover and their "love child" recognition, financial support, and respect.   If that seems like I'm "pushing it," imagine the story were set in the South and his housekeeper was African-American and he cut funding for programs which significantly benefit African-Americans.  Would it still seem so outlandish? 

My point here is not Arnold but us. Our culture, of which he's a member.

What and whom did Arnold value and desire?  And what and whom did he publically value and fund?  It's one thing to desire or value something or someone and another to do so openly and honestly and literally pay them their due - with respect.

Back to our discussion of work and skilled and unskilled labor and what is valued... someone's benefiting when these some jobs are not framed as "skilled" and the people working them are not framed as of the same worth as the people employing them - and it's not the people working the jobs.

This is another long thread that we could follow but time being what it is and it being a miracle if anyone is still reading at this point, I refer you again to this post (if you want to read it) and move back to the central thread...

... which is, to say it again... that funding Adult Education is not an economic problem - it is a perceptual one.

If we perceive immigrants - and all immigrants, not just H-1 visa immigrants or immigrants that are venture capitalists or Governor but also the people who picked the food you ate a littler earlier today - and your immigrant housekeeper and old people and children and people who didn't finish high school and people struggling with economic and social injustice and the incarcerated or the formerly incarcerated or anyone else we put in the "other" box - as just as valuable as "us" (who and whatever that is) - then we are making choices about how we spend out money - the money created by us, all of us, together the makers of the EIGHTH LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD - and yes, that's including the people who picked the cherry tomatoes you ate at lunch and worked in the slaughterhouse that produced the all white meat, no skin, no bone chicken breast you'll eat for dinner.

... if we do that, if see value in all people and all work, then we choose to spend money on Adult Education.

And we don't make the choice to punish people or Adult Education by continually defunding or destabilizing their programs.  And we don't hold out carrots while threatening sticks until they quietly do as they're told as if they are bad little children who must be taught to sit up straight and behave right.

And we find the courage within ourselves to say what we see, to embolden one another with the truth, to cheer one another on by sharing what we see and know, so that each of us doesn't feel so alone.  We talk about our value, our strengths, our gifts, and our accomplishments.  Because, when you have continually been told you don't matter, it takes courage to say that you do.

And we give voice to the truth of what happened and how it affected us and how we feel about it.  To talk about the fatigue, the discouragement, the cost of all this to us.  I have seen people go down through this process, to fall apart physically, to give in to discouragement, bitterness, cynicism, or despair, to disconnect and give up on things ever being better than what they are now.  So rather than give away our power to despair, we mourn, cry, stamp our feet, and grieve what has been lost.

And then we look at the crap.  We don't turn away in aversion.  We put on our spectacles and look at it as something we, the people, have created.  We try to figure out how it got there, what it's made of, and if it can be used as fertilizer.   And we go on, making the best of things and viewing everyone - including the folks who may have intended us harm, as other people of equal value to ourselves.  People we may need to be watchful of, maybe, until they learn better.  But people.  Just like us. 

And then we get all kinds of benefits.

We can begin to see the full picture.  We can see our worth and our weaknesses.  Our value and our vulnerability.  We can see have power, both alone and together - and that we use our power to help and to harm.  We can see that as a culture, we've elevated some talents, some jobs, some people above others, creating a hierarchy of worth where there is none.  We can see there is value in all people and worth in all work.  We can see our inter-connectedness.  We can set down the shame we all carry for needing love, attention, connection, food, tenderness, and touch and receive what we need  - without having to manipulate and exploit and devalue others in order to get our needs met.  

We need each other.  That's the truth of being human.  And a beautiful truth it is, too, because it speaks to our underlying unity.  We are not, in fact "rugged individuals" who exist alone, birthed out of rock and sky.  We are a group species who, from the very beginning, are about connection.  Even in a test tube, it takes two to make a thing all right.  The only thing in this world we can truly do alone is die.  Everything else depends on others - most especially our creation, birth, and survival, not to mention, language, culture, and happiness.   When we can embrace that, we will no longer need to hurt and harm each other to meet our needs. We can share and negotiate as equals. 

That's wonderful and important and liberating, all by itself.   We could stop right here!

But there's this other thing:

Seeing things clearly is a skill.  It's a skill that can be learned and strengthened and sharpened and improved.

But it can't be learned or strengthened if we don't use it. 

And why is this so important?

Because far, far bigger than the Teacher of Global Financial Meltdown is another Teacher... now appearing in classrooms all over the world.

Climate Change.

Our friend. Our enemy.  Our master.  Our liberator.

And if we do not begin to get into the habit of seeing the truth of things... of not finger pointing and blaming and badmouthing and hating... of not denying and repressing and cowering and shaking...  of not putting our heads in the ground and remaining bassakwards to what is real...

we are not going to make it.

Denial is a habit and whenever we practice it, we strengthen it just as wherever we set it down, it shrinks and becomes harder to take up again.

Climate Change, as no other teacher before it, is here to teach us that truth is not be feared but learned from.

Indeed, it is all that can set us free.







Minggu, 13 Maret 2016

adult history CFT Resolution 4 "Ensure Adult Education Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity" Passes at the CFT 2016 State Conference - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Adult Education Task Force, Artikel Affirming Adult Ed, Artikel Budget, Artikel CFT, Artikel How Things Work, Artikel Legislature, Artikel San Mateo Adult School, Artikel Unity, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history CFT Resolution 4 "Ensure Adult Education Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity" Passes at the CFT 2016 State Conference - japraklupo
link : adult history CFT Resolution 4 "Ensure Adult Education Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity" Passes at the CFT 2016 State Conference - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

In mid January, CFT Local 4681 of San Mateo Adult School wrote and passed a resolution about Adult Education.  You can the Local 4681 resolution in full here.   Local 4681 then took their resolution, titled, "Resolution to Ensure that Adult Education Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity" to the CFT Adult Education Commission on January 23rd.   The Adult Education Commission considered it, made some alterations to it - primarily shortening it - kept the same title, and then passed it.
CFT Adult Education Commission members at their January 23rd, 2016 meeting.
Chair Jack Carroll is in the center bac.  Lily Adlawan, center front,
is the Local 4681 member who brought the resolution to the meeting.
Kathy Jasper, in the red Adult Education Matters t-shirt, is an AEC member
and also a CFT Vice President in the CFT State Executive Council.


Both resolutions - different with the same name and the same intention - were submitted to the CFT 2016 State Convention

At the convention, Local 4681 President Bruce Neuberger, Vice President David Doneff, and myself, Secretary Cynthia Eagleton met with members of the Adult Education Commission and agreed on a compromise position.  Resolution 3, the Local 4681 version, was withdrawn from consideration.  Resolution 4, with one amendment (the line, "and especially, more money for high need areas" in the "be it resolved" section), was submitted and passed in the Professional Issues: Early Childhood/K12 Committee and then voted first to the floor of the General Assembly - where it was resoundingly passed on Saturday, March 12th.

Hooray!

Thanks to all who worked to write and pass this resolution.  May it bring increased understanding of the value of Adult Education and increased support.

Notice that in the "be it resolved" section it advocates for the passage of legislation which supports any of these points.

AB1846, here we come.

Here is the resolution as passed, in full:

Hit the link to see it.


Resolution to Ensure that Adult Education 
Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity



Whereas education is a human right for people of all ages; and


Whereas Adult Schools have been serving the people of California from every community, including those with the greatest needs and least resources, for over 150 years; and


Whereas, during the last recession, Adult Education was the only branch of public education in California which was nearly eliminated through a combination of funding cuts and allowing districts to take any and all adult school funds for other purposes (categorical flexibility); and



Whereas there is no increase for Adult Education, even though Governor Brown’s January 2016 Budget Proposal increases public school funding by $2.4 billion over the current year and more than $24 billion higher than at the depth of the recession, directing $71.6 billion, the greatest portion of California tax revenue, to education; and

Whereas the previous adult education funding usually included a yearly COLA and the new funding does not include a COLA to accommodate annual increased costs; and

Whereas, the need for adult education to mitigate rising income inequality has increased, and

Whereas there are 15.3 million adults in the areas targeted by the state for adult education and the system currently serves about 1 million, leaving 14 million unserved; and


Whereas adult schools once had a mission to provide a broad education to all adults, state funding has been narrowed to seven programs with a focus on workforce development; and


Whereas the future of California depends not only on the number of people employed but also on their physical and mental health; civic, community and family engagement; and ability to think critically and prepare for 21st century political, economic, social, and environmental change, it is crucial that Adult Education be available to all adults and well-funded with a broad mission,


Therefore be it resolved that the CFT advocate for:

       Increased funds for adult education sufficient to meet the need and, especially, more money for high need areas,
       A broad mission of education in which adult schools promote the skills necessary to meet the challenges of the 21st-century and serve the whole person, the whole family, and therefore the community and the society, as an important, equal, and self-sufficient branch of public education,
       The passage of legislation which supports any of these points.








In mid January, CFT Local 4681 of San Mateo Adult School wrote and passed a resolution about Adult Education.  You can the Local 4681 resolution in full here.   Local 4681 then took their resolution, titled, "Resolution to Ensure that Adult Education Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity" to the CFT Adult Education Commission on January 23rd.   The Adult Education Commission considered it, made some alterations to it - primarily shortening it - kept the same title, and then passed it.
CFT Adult Education Commission members at their January 23rd, 2016 meeting.
Chair Jack Carroll is in the center bac.  Lily Adlawan, center front,
is the Local 4681 member who brought the resolution to the meeting.
Kathy Jasper, in the red Adult Education Matters t-shirt, is an AEC member
and also a CFT Vice President in the CFT State Executive Council.


Both resolutions - different with the same name and the same intention - were submitted to the CFT 2016 State Convention

At the convention, Local 4681 President Bruce Neuberger, Vice President David Doneff, and myself, Secretary Cynthia Eagleton met with members of the Adult Education Commission and agreed on a compromise position.  Resolution 3, the Local 4681 version, was withdrawn from consideration.  Resolution 4, with one amendment (the line, "and especially, more money for high need areas" in the "be it resolved" section), was submitted and passed in the Professional Issues: Early Childhood/K12 Committee and then voted first to the floor of the General Assembly - where it was resoundingly passed on Saturday, March 12th.

Hooray!

Thanks to all who worked to write and pass this resolution.  May it bring increased understanding of the value of Adult Education and increased support.

Notice that in the "be it resolved" section it advocates for the passage of legislation which supports any of these points.

AB1846, here we come.

Here is the resolution as passed, in full:

Hit the link to see it.


Resolution to Ensure that Adult Education 
Exists in Best and Fullest Capacity



Whereas education is a human right for people of all ages; and


Whereas Adult Schools have been serving the people of California from every community, including those with the greatest needs and least resources, for over 150 years; and


Whereas, during the last recession, Adult Education was the only branch of public education in California which was nearly eliminated through a combination of funding cuts and allowing districts to take any and all adult school funds for other purposes (categorical flexibility); and



Whereas there is no increase for Adult Education, even though Governor Brown’s January 2016 Budget Proposal increases public school funding by $2.4 billion over the current year and more than $24 billion higher than at the depth of the recession, directing $71.6 billion, the greatest portion of California tax revenue, to education; and

Whereas the previous adult education funding usually included a yearly COLA and the new funding does not include a COLA to accommodate annual increased costs; and

Whereas, the need for adult education to mitigate rising income inequality has increased, and

Whereas there are 15.3 million adults in the areas targeted by the state for adult education and the system currently serves about 1 million, leaving 14 million unserved; and


Whereas adult schools once had a mission to provide a broad education to all adults, state funding has been narrowed to seven programs with a focus on workforce development; and


Whereas the future of California depends not only on the number of people employed but also on their physical and mental health; civic, community and family engagement; and ability to think critically and prepare for 21st century political, economic, social, and environmental change, it is crucial that Adult Education be available to all adults and well-funded with a broad mission,


Therefore be it resolved that the CFT advocate for:

       Increased funds for adult education sufficient to meet the need and, especially, more money for high need areas,
       A broad mission of education in which adult schools promote the skills necessary to meet the challenges of the 21st-century and serve the whole person, the whole family, and therefore the community and the society, as an important, equal, and self-sufficient branch of public education,
       The passage of legislation which supports any of these points.








Selasa, 01 Maret 2016

adult history CCAE Leg Day and State Conference - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel CCAE, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history CCAE Leg Day and State Conference - japraklupo
link : adult history CCAE Leg Day and State Conference - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

From CCAE Executive Director Adriana Sanchez-Aldana:
CCAE Members and Friends,
Throughout the year, there are many important activities that take place in your local chapters; in the six CCAE state sections; and at the state level. The spring brings us two important statewide activities in which I hope you will find yourself actively engaged. Our two statewide events are the Legislative Action Day (Leg Day) and the annual State Conference.

Leg Day
Leg Day is a 1 ½ day event, in Sacramento. Our headquarters is the Sacramento Hyatt, 1209 L Street. Hotel rooms are still available, at the CCAE (single or double, per night) rate of $179.

Hit the link to read more.
This year, Leg Day will begin with a training on Monday, April 4th; and legislative visits will be scheduled by your section Leg Chairs, on Tuesday, April 5th. The Monday afternoon training session will provide important "Talking Points," and on Tuesday you will participate in legislative visits as scheduled for you by your Section Leg Chairperson. If possible, include an adult education student on your team, as legislators and their staff appreciate hearing student stories. Please contact your section Legislative Chairperson to participate:

Bay Section
Rhonda Slota
Central Section
Lori McClintick
LA Metro Section
Vlad Tigno
Northern Section
Patricia Bradshaw
South Coast Section
Nancy Martinez
Southern Section
Karen Bautista
State Conference
This year's conference theme is "Adult Education: The Bridge to College, Careers, and Community" and will take place April 21-23, 2016, at the San Francisco Airport Marriott. At this time, the conference hotel is sold out. HOWEVER, we will have additional conference rate ($199) hotel rooms very soon---please check the CCAE website for an update. The conference committee is working hard to ensure an interesting program, updated information, and a fun Friday night activity. In addition, we will be honoring several of our outstanding adult education teachers, support staff, and administrators for their extraordinary work, support, and service. Please visit the CCAE website for the complete list of awardees and additional conference details (ccaestate.org/2016-ccae-state-conference).
I'm happy to point out that, this year, several of our conference attendees will be able to attend, due to the generosity of the Dollar General Foundation. Two $500 scholarships were awarded, by each section (total of $6,000), for a special project or professional development activity. Several members chose to attend the state conference, and we look forward to seeing them there. Dollar General Scholarship awardees will be announced in our April update. 

I look forward to seeing you at both of these events!
Sincerely,


Adriana Sanchez-Aldana
Executive Director
 
The Bay Section is proud to host the 2016 CCAE State Conference, at the San Francisco Airport Marriott Waterfront Hotel, on April 21-23, 2016. Outstanding professional development and networking opportunities will abound. This is a conference you will not want to miss, so click here to register, today!

From CCAE Executive Director Adriana Sanchez-Aldana:
CCAE Members and Friends,
Throughout the year, there are many important activities that take place in your local chapters; in the six CCAE state sections; and at the state level. The spring brings us two important statewide activities in which I hope you will find yourself actively engaged. Our two statewide events are the Legislative Action Day (Leg Day) and the annual State Conference.

Leg Day
Leg Day is a 1 ½ day event, in Sacramento. Our headquarters is the Sacramento Hyatt, 1209 L Street. Hotel rooms are still available, at the CCAE (single or double, per night) rate of $179.

Hit the link to read more.
This year, Leg Day will begin with a training on Monday, April 4th; and legislative visits will be scheduled by your section Leg Chairs, on Tuesday, April 5th. The Monday afternoon training session will provide important "Talking Points," and on Tuesday you will participate in legislative visits as scheduled for you by your Section Leg Chairperson. If possible, include an adult education student on your team, as legislators and their staff appreciate hearing student stories. Please contact your section Legislative Chairperson to participate:

Bay Section
Rhonda Slota
Central Section
Lori McClintick
LA Metro Section
Vlad Tigno
Northern Section
Patricia Bradshaw
South Coast Section
Nancy Martinez
Southern Section
Karen Bautista
State Conference
This year's conference theme is "Adult Education: The Bridge to College, Careers, and Community" and will take place April 21-23, 2016, at the San Francisco Airport Marriott. At this time, the conference hotel is sold out. HOWEVER, we will have additional conference rate ($199) hotel rooms very soon---please check the CCAE website for an update. The conference committee is working hard to ensure an interesting program, updated information, and a fun Friday night activity. In addition, we will be honoring several of our outstanding adult education teachers, support staff, and administrators for their extraordinary work, support, and service. Please visit the CCAE website for the complete list of awardees and additional conference details (ccaestate.org/2016-ccae-state-conference).
I'm happy to point out that, this year, several of our conference attendees will be able to attend, due to the generosity of the Dollar General Foundation. Two $500 scholarships were awarded, by each section (total of $6,000), for a special project or professional development activity. Several members chose to attend the state conference, and we look forward to seeing them there. Dollar General Scholarship awardees will be announced in our April update. 

I look forward to seeing you at both of these events!
Sincerely,


Adriana Sanchez-Aldana
Executive Director
 
The Bay Section is proud to host the 2016 CCAE State Conference, at the San Francisco Airport Marriott Waterfront Hotel, on April 21-23, 2016. Outstanding professional development and networking opportunities will abound. This is a conference you will not want to miss, so click here to register, today!

adult history Letter Campaign to Governor Brown for Adequate Funding of Adult Education - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan Artikel Budget, Artikel Letter Writing, Artikel Regional Consortia, Artikel Save Your Adult School, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Letter Campaign to Governor Brown for Adequate Funding of Adult Education - japraklupo
link : adult history Letter Campaign to Governor Brown for Adequate Funding of Adult Education - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

Borrowed from Kristen Pursley's blog Save Your Adult School:

Urgent:  Write Governor Brown Today to Request Restoration of Adult Education Funding to $750 Million

Posted on
  
Between 2008 and 2012, funding for California’s adult schools was slashed by half and never restored.  Adult schools have a new mandate to partner more closely with community colleges and other educational organizations that serve adults, but they struggle with inadequate funding.  Governor Brown needs to hear from adult school students and teachers, from business people who rely on the adult schools to train workers, and from community members who see how their adult school enriches their community.

Hit the link to read more.


These letters are part of a statewide push , headed up by Assembly Member Patty Lopez (D- San Fernando) , to get adult education the funding it desperately needs.

I would recommend that letters start as follows:

Dear Governor Brown,

Today I write to you to as a (Student/Teacher/Advocate) who supports the restoration of adult education funding back to $750 million dollars.

After the start of the letter then have them tell their story, sign their name with their city and address.

To send a letter directly to the governor:

Governor Jerry Brown
C/O State Capitol Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

Please also send a copy to Patty Lopez. You can also send the letter just to her, and she will make sure the governor gets it.

In Northern California, send letters to:

Christopher Sanchez
Legislative Aide
39th Assembly District
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0039


In Southern California, send letters to:

Nelson Pichardo, Consultant, Office of Assemblywoman Patty Lopez
302 South Brand Blvd.
Suite 212
San Fernando, Ca 91340

To copy your own state legislators, you can find their addresses here:

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html

Borrowed from Kristen Pursley's blog Save Your Adult School:

Urgent:  Write Governor Brown Today to Request Restoration of Adult Education Funding to $750 Million

Posted on
  

Between 2008 and 2012, funding for California’s adult schools was slashed by half and never restored.  Adult schools have a new mandate to partner more closely with community colleges and other educational organizations that serve adults, but they struggle with inadequate funding.  Governor Brown needs to hear from adult school students and teachers, from business people who rely on the adult schools to train workers, and from community members who see how their adult school enriches their community.

Hit the link to read more.


These letters are part of a statewide push , headed up by Assembly Member Patty Lopez (D- San Fernando) , to get adult education the funding it desperately needs.

I would recommend that letters start as follows:

Dear Governor Brown,

Today I write to you to as a (Student/Teacher/Advocate) who supports the restoration of adult education funding back to $750 million dollars.

After the start of the letter then have them tell their story, sign their name with their city and address.

To send a letter directly to the governor:

Governor Jerry Brown
C/O State Capitol Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

Please also send a copy to Patty Lopez. You can also send the letter just to her, and she will make sure the governor gets it.

In Northern California, send letters to:

Christopher Sanchez
Legislative Aide
39th Assembly District
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0039


In Southern California, send letters to:

Nelson Pichardo, Consultant, Office of Assemblywoman Patty Lopez
302 South Brand Blvd.
Suite 212
San Fernando, Ca 91340

To copy your own state legislators, you can find their addresses here:

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html

adult history Rebirth of Oakland Adult School - japraklupo

Maret 2016 - Hallo sahabat fashion, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Maret 2016, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.

Judul : adult history Rebirth of Oakland Adult School - japraklupo
link : adult history Rebirth of Oakland Adult School - japraklupo

Baca juga


Maret 2016

Good news about Oakland Adult School!   After many difficult years, Oakland Adult School is finally growing again - and given the high need for Adult Ed in Oakland, that's tremendously important.

Compare the good news below to this August 2013 update about OAS.  

What a big change, eh?  And brought about by whom?  Us!  Because we recognized our worth and stood up and spoke out about it. 

Get the full scoop below in this op-ed by Sue Pon:

School District Offers New Educational Opportunities for Adults

By  Posted
                     
By Sue Pon
sue+pon
Sue Pon

For the first time in many years, the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) is expanding our Adult & Career Education offerings

Hit the link to learn more.


This work is made possible by new state funding, and the need and opportunity are tremendous.

OUSD believes that Oakland Adult & Career Education is a critical part of being a full service community district where every student thrives.

Research indicates that a parent’s reading skill, particularly a mother’s reading skill, is the greatest determinant of children’s academic success.

During the 2014-15 school year, Oakland Adult & Career Education (OACE) served 1,000 adults in our GED (General Education Development), Family Literacy, and Career & Technical Education (CTE)/Project SEARCH programs.

Take the example of Damon Thompson, a former OUSD student who did not do so well in school when he was younger, dropping out before he graduated.

He learned about our adult education programs while serving on the School Site Council at his daughter’s school, La Escuelita. Damon realized he could get an education and serve as an example to his daughter.

Last year, Damon earned his GED by studying in OUSD’s Adult Education program. He did this as a single parent while working two jobs and being a parent leader at La Escuelita.

He is now pursuing further education at Laney College, studying Administrative Justice.

Another inspiring example is from Ana Anguiano. Two years ago, she arrived in the U.S., in her words, “with nothing,” no job, family support, or education.

Two years, she was attending an adult education graduation ceremony. Choking back tears, she said OUSD had given her “everything” – an education that had helped her land a job to support her and her daughter.

If Damon and Ana can do it, finding their second chance through OUSD’s adult education programs, you can too.

Happy OAS Graduate


With new funding, the goal is to serve an additional 400-500 adults by offering a new College and Career Readiness Pathway Program. The new Adult Education Block Grant funding made possible by Assembly Bill 104 that passed last year, in coordination with the Northern Alameda Consortium for Adult Education, will help adults to more seamlessly transition to the GED program, to academic and career technical education studies in the community college, and to gainful employment.

The College and Career Readiness Pathway Program will provide a sequence of courses, preparing adult students with basic English, math, English as a Second Language (ESL) and study skills for college and careers.

Classes will be offered at centers adjacent to Laney and Merritt Colleges, and in community locations, including Allen Temple Baptist Church.

Initial registration and enrollment for the College and Career Readiness Pathway Program is onsite through Feb. 16.

For more program information, please go to ousd.org/OACE or (510) 273-2310.

Sue Pon is director of Oakland Adult & Career Education

Good news about Oakland Adult School!   After many difficult years, Oakland Adult School is finally growing again - and given the high need for Adult Ed in Oakland, that's tremendously important.

Compare the good news below to this August 2013 update about OAS.  

What a big change, eh?  And brought about by whom?  Us!  Because we recognized our worth and stood up and spoke out about it. 

Get the full scoop below in this op-ed by Sue Pon:

School District Offers New Educational Opportunities for Adults

By  Posted
                     

By Sue Pon
sue+pon
Sue Pon

For the first time in many years, the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) is expanding our Adult & Career Education offerings

Hit the link to learn more.


This work is made possible by new state funding, and the need and opportunity are tremendous.

OUSD believes that Oakland Adult & Career Education is a critical part of being a full service community district where every student thrives.

Research indicates that a parent’s reading skill, particularly a mother’s reading skill, is the greatest determinant of children’s academic success.

During the 2014-15 school year, Oakland Adult & Career Education (OACE) served 1,000 adults in our GED (General Education Development), Family Literacy, and Career & Technical Education (CTE)/Project SEARCH programs.

Take the example of Damon Thompson, a former OUSD student who did not do so well in school when he was younger, dropping out before he graduated.

He learned about our adult education programs while serving on the School Site Council at his daughter’s school, La Escuelita. Damon realized he could get an education and serve as an example to his daughter.

Last year, Damon earned his GED by studying in OUSD’s Adult Education program. He did this as a single parent while working two jobs and being a parent leader at La Escuelita.

He is now pursuing further education at Laney College, studying Administrative Justice.

Another inspiring example is from Ana Anguiano. Two years ago, she arrived in the U.S., in her words, “with nothing,” no job, family support, or education.

Two years, she was attending an adult education graduation ceremony. Choking back tears, she said OUSD had given her “everything” – an education that had helped her land a job to support her and her daughter.

If Damon and Ana can do it, finding their second chance through OUSD’s adult education programs, you can too.

Happy OAS Graduate


With new funding, the goal is to serve an additional 400-500 adults by offering a new College and Career Readiness Pathway Program. The new Adult Education Block Grant funding made possible by Assembly Bill 104 that passed last year, in coordination with the Northern Alameda Consortium for Adult Education, will help adults to more seamlessly transition to the GED program, to academic and career technical education studies in the community college, and to gainful employment.

The College and Career Readiness Pathway Program will provide a sequence of courses, preparing adult students with basic English, math, English as a Second Language (ESL) and study skills for college and careers.

Classes will be offered at centers adjacent to Laney and Merritt Colleges, and in community locations, including Allen Temple Baptist Church.

Initial registration and enrollment for the College and Career Readiness Pathway Program is onsite through Feb. 16.

For more program information, please go to ousd.org/OACE or (510) 273-2310.

Sue Pon is director of Oakland Adult & Career Education